About MEAJO | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions to authors | Online submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology
Users Online: 753   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 61-65 Table of Contents     

Visual rehabilitation by scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses in amblyopic aphakic children


1 Department of Ophthalmology and School of Ophthalmic Technicians, Sultan Qaboos University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Muscat, Oman
2 Department of Ophthalmology and School of Ophthalmic Technicians, Sultan Qaboos University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Muscat, Oman and Magrabi Eye and Ear Center, Al Ahli Specialty Hospital, Doha, Qatar
3 Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Sultan Qaboos University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Muscat, Oman

Date of Web Publication13-Jul-2009

Correspondence Address:
Alexander A Bialasiewicz
Eye and Ear Center, Al Ahli Specialty Hospital, Doha 23293, Qatar

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-9233.51994

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background/Aims: To report on the outcome of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens (S-IOL) implantation in aphakic amblyopic children after 1 year.
Methods:
Amblyopic children with aphakia after traumatic and congenital cataract surgery unsuitable for spectacle or contact lens correction were operated with an anterior vitrectomy and inside-out double thread scleral fixation of an Alcon CZ70BD pcIOL. Refraction and vision was compared after 12 months.
Results:
From 2001-2006, 23 S-IOLs were implanted in 16 children (19 unilateral, 4 bilateral) aged 2-16 years: 10 eyes with traumatic [Group A], and 13 eyes with congenital cataracts including 3 eyes with ectopia lentis [Group B]. Preoperative UCVA compared to postoperative UCVA improved in 9/10 eyes in group A and 12/13 eyes in group B. Preoperative BCVA compared to postoperative UCVA improved in 9/10 eyes (90 percent) in group A and 4/13 eyes (31 percent) in group B. Mean age at surgery in group A was 6.8 years (1.5-16yrs) and in group B 10.5 years (4-16 years). More than one year elapsed in 2/10 eyes of group A and 8/13 eyes in group B. Postoperative refraction was within 2.0D of target in 17/23 eyes. Complications included temporary IOP rise in 2, vitreous hemorrhage in 1, and iris capture in 3 eyes. Two eyes required revision surgery.
Conclusion: S-IOL implantation may be beneficial for aphakic children lacking other means for visual rehabilitation to improve vision. Amblyopia may be improved in most trauma, but only few congenital cataract eyes.

Keywords: cataract, trauma, pediatric IOL, amblyopia, scleral fixation


How to cite this article:
Ganesh A, Bialasiewicz AA, Al-Zuhaibi SM, Sabt BI, Ganguly SS. Visual rehabilitation by scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses in amblyopic aphakic children. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2008;15:61-5

How to cite this URL:
Ganesh A, Bialasiewicz AA, Al-Zuhaibi SM, Sabt BI, Ganguly SS. Visual rehabilitation by scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses in amblyopic aphakic children. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2019 Oct 21];15:61-5. Available from: http://www.meajo.org/text.asp?2008/15/2/61/51994

Visual rehabilitation of aphakic children in many developing countries by spectacles and contact lenses is difficult due to the prevailing environment, culture and socioeconomics. Because of the noncompliance of patients and parents amblyopia is commonplace in Oman. [1],[2]

Recent studies have shown that the implantation of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses (S-IOL) is feasible and renders more favorable results in children over 2 years of age if non-compliant with spectacles or contact lenses. [3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9] Implantation of IOLs in children less than 2 years is still controversially discussed. [10],[11] Therefore, we have performed a study to compare the outcomes of secondary intraocular lens implantation in aphakic eyes of children older than 2 years previously operated for traumatic and congenital cataracts.


   Patients and Methods Top


Patients: From 2002-2005, 28 patients under 16 years of age were operated in a single center study at the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital in Muscat, Oman. 23 eyes of 19 patients were examined one year after S-IOL surgery and were eligible for this study.

Indications: A secondary IOL implantation was considered in all children with unilateral aphakia without capsular support, because contact lens correction in Oman has been shown unsuccessful and costly, and in children with bilateral aphakia without capsular support who showed poor compliance with spectacles and contact lenses. [2] Iris fixated and other anterior chamber IOLs and corneal refractive interventions were not considered. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents in all cases.

Examinations: All patients underwent a detailed ophthalmic examination that included preoperative and postoperative uncorrected (UCVA) and best corrected (BCVA) visual acuity, orthoptic evaluation, slit-lamp examination of the anterior segment, and intraocular pressure. The pcIOL power was calculated using the SRK II formula by A-scan biometric (OcuScan® RxP, Alcon® ), topographic ( Atlas More Details® , Zeiss-Humphrey) and keratometric (NIDEK) readings. IOL power selections were modified according to the charts by age. [12]

Surgery: Under general anesthesia transconjunctival scleral troughs were made at 2 and 8 o'clock 2 mm behind the limbus, and the anterior chamber was entered through a scleral tunnel. Anterior vitrectomy was performed prior to pcIOL (Alcon CZ70BD) implantation in all cases. The pcIOL model used in this study was A double-armed 10x0 polypropylene (Ethicon, Inc.) suture on a bent or straight needle was used to secure the pcIOL (with a first knot on the haptic) in the sulcus by perforating the sclera in the lamellar troughs at 2 and 8 o'clock. In that way, 2 threads were holding the IOL on each side. The scleral suture was then tied to itself and the sclera, and the knot was buried in the trough. Thjs maneuver was performed to prevent possible IOL subluxation due to breakage of one thread in later years as has been previously reported. [7] A subconjunctival injection of 2mg dexamethasone phosphate and 20mg gentamicin sulfate was given at the end of surgery.

Postoperative Management: Prednisolone acetate eye drops (1 percent) were administered hourly for the the first 24 hours and then every 2 hours, and gentamicin 0.3 percent drops every 6 hours. The frequency of the steroid drops was tapered according to the degree of inflammation. Amblyopia was treated by occlusion therapy and/or daily atropine instillation in the good eye.

Statistics: Data were evaluated by descriptive statistical tests (Wilcoxon's and paired t-test). Comparison of means was carried out using the Kruskal Wallis test. Pearson's coefficients were calculated to study the association between two variables.


   Results Top


S-IOLs were implanted in 10 eyes with aphakia after surgery for traumatic cataracts [Group A], in 10 eyes with congenital cataracts and in 3 eyes with ectopic lenses [Group B]. Patients in Group B were slightly older at the time of S-IOL implantation (Group A: mean age 7.3 years th + 3.6; Group B: mean age 10.38 years th + 3.77). Primary S-IOL implantation during lensectomy was done in 3 eyes with ectopic lenses due to Weill-Marchesani and Usher syndrome. Secondary IOL implantation was performed in all other eyes. (see [Table 1],[Table 2])

Unilateral / Bilateral Surgery: The major reason for S-IOL implantation was unilateral aphakia after cataract surgery for trauma (10 eyes) and congenital cataract (5 eyes). Four patients (3 congenital cataracts, 1 ectopic lens) had a bilateral S-IOL implantation.

Postoperative Vision: Because best postoperative UCVA was the target of surgery, and patients were operated because they did not comply with visual aids, postoperative BCVA was not included in this evaluation of postoperative vision. Preoperative UCVA vs postoperative UCVA improved in all 23/23 eyes significantly from mostly finger counting to a 5 meter vision (p=0.001).

Preoperative BCVA vs. postoperative UCVA improved in 8/10 eyes with trauma, but only in 4/13 eyes with congenital cataracts and ectopic lenses (p=0.03).

Compliance with amblyopia therapy was difficult in all patients. Persistent amblyopia after one year of treatment was seen in 11/23 eyes (48 percent).

Postoperative Refraction after 1 Year: Postoperative refraction was within th + 2.0 D of the estimated spherical equivalent in most of the eyes. One eye was miscalculated with a refraction of -5.0/-2.0/160º, and 5/23 eyes (4 trauma, 1 congenital cataract) had a refraction of 3D different from target.

Amblyopia: Prior to the S-IOL implantation, deprivation amblyopia was observed in all eyes. Persistence of amblyopia and limited visual rehabilitation after S-IOL surgery was a more significant problem in the congenital cataract compared to the trauma group (p=0.012) [Table 1],[Table 2]. Other factors that precluded visual recovery in both groups were retinal dystrophy, corneal scars, and keratoconus.

Delay until Refractive S-IOL Implantation: The delay between primary lensectomy and S-IOL implantation was significantly different with a mean of 13.5 months (<2 months to 6 years) in Group A and a mean of 70 months (< 2 months to 15 years) in Group B (p=0.026).

Postoperative Complications: Postoperative complications included temporary elevation of intraocular pressure (2 eyes), and vitreous hemorrhage (1 eye). A pcIOL decentration was observed in 3 eyes necessitating revision surgery in 2 eyes. No retinal or infectious complications were encountered.


   Discussion Top


Our study shows that scleral fixated pcIOL implantation in children of a developing country with restrictive cultural beliefs about spectacles and environmental limitations of contact lens use is an effective means to correct aphakia in eyes lacking posterior capsular support.

Posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation has been accepted to offer the most satisfactory visual outcome in aphakic children above 2 years of age for over 20 years. [10],[11] The use of the procedure is controversially discussed for infants under the age of two years due to IOL calculation problems with regard to small globe size, axial length changes, corneal flattening and postoperative complication rate. [3],[12],[13],[14],[15] For IOL calculations, we applied the age-adjusted corrections suggested by Crouch. [12] We did not substract 1D from the final power of the S-IOL as had been suggested previously. [5]

In our study an improvement in visual acuity between pre- and postoperative UCVA was achieved in 21/23 eyes (91 percent), and the postoperative (=target) UCVA vs. the preoperative BCVA improved in 12/23 eyes (52 percent): 2/10 eyes (20 percent) of the congenital cataracts, 2/3 eyes (66 percent) of the ectopic lenses and in 8/10 eyes (80 percent) of the trauma group. The latter data may be interpreted as an effective postoperative amblyopia treatment, which was significant in the trauma vs. the cataract group. Only two of the 10 patients with congenital cataracts who underwent secondary pcIOL implantation experienced an improvement of amblyopia. However, a point to note is that the cohort of patients with congenital cataracts was older than the cohort with traumatic cataracts. We attributed the difference in visual performance in the congenital and traumatic cataract groups to irreversible amblyopia in the former. Previous studies have shown that the rate of refractive change in eyes with scleral fixated pcIOLs is the same as that in children with in-the-bag pcIOL implantation. [5],[16]

Predicted postoperative refraction was on target in 17/23 eyes (74 percent), which was comparable to previous and long-term studies. [7],[8],[9] However, postoperative refraction results were significantly less variable in groups B (congenital cataracts and ectopic lenses) vs. group A (trauma), probably because of the underlying corneal pathologies. Ten of 23 eyes maintained preoperative visual acuity levels.

Scleral fixated pcIOL implantation in children is technically more difficult than routine posterior chamber IOL implantation. Anterior vitrectomy as performed in our study is required in all cases to decrease the probability of vitreous traction leading to secondary retinal detachment. [17]

Complications in our study included temporarily elevated IOP unrelated to the IOL insertion, vitreous hemorrhage due to attempted posterior synechiolysis and pcIOL subluxation requiring revision surgery in 2/23 eyes (8.7 percent). This low rate may, of course, increase in the following years, a fact, which has been published recently. [7] Erosion, breaking or wearing away of the 10x0 polypropylene thread is of some concern, since it has been shown that fibrous reactions around the IOL haptics is lacking. [18],[19] However, we have applied a method by which 2 threads each at 2 and 8 o'clock are holding the IOL with knots in troughs, [20] and expect a decreased possibility of IOL subluxation. Complications encountered in our study are comparable with those seen in other pediatric scleral-fixated pcIOL studies, and retinal problems arising from the procedure or endophthalmitis due to a fistula have not been encountered. [17],[21] No study to date exists with long-term follow-ups into adulthood.

In conclusion, scleral fixation of pcIOLs provides an effective means to correct aphakia in eyes without posterior capsular support in patients otherwise doomed by cultural, environmental and socioeconomic reasons for deep amblyopia.

 
   References Top

1.Lithander J. Prevalence of amblyopia with anisometropia or strabismus among schoolchildren in the Sultanate of Oman. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76(6):658-662.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Lithander J, Sjóstrand J. Anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia in the age group 2 years and above: a prospective study of the results of treatment. Br J Ophthalmol 1991;75(2):111-116  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Sharpe MR, Biglan AW, Gerontis CC. Scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses in children. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1996;27:337-341.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.Kumar M, Arora R, Sanga L, Sota LD. Scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation in unilateral aphakic children. Ophthalmology 1999;106:2184-2189.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
5.Buckley EG. Scleral fixated (sutured) posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in children. JAAPOS 1999;3:289-294.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Epley KD, Shainberg MJ, Lueder GT, Tychsen L. Pediatric secondary lens implantation in the absence of capsular support. JAAPOS 2001;5:301-306.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Buckley EG. Hanging by a thread: the long-term efficacy and safety of transscleral sutures intraocular lenses in children. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007;105:294-311.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Asadi R, Kheirkhah A. Long-term results of scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses in children. Ophthalmology 2008;115(1):67-72.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Ahmadieh H, Javadi MA. Intraocular lens implantation in children. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2001;12(1):30-34.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Lambert SR, Lynn M, Drews-Botsch C, et al. A comparison of grating visual acuity, strabismus, and reoperation outcomes among children with aphakia and pseudophakia after unilateral cataract surgery during the first six months of life. JAAPOS 2001;5:70-75.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Lindquist TD, Agapitos PJ, Lindstrom RL, et al. Transscleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses in the absence of capsular support. Ophthalmic Surg 1989;20:769-775.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  
12.Wilson ME, Bluestein EC, Wang XH. Current trends in the use of intraocular lenses in children. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994;20:579-583.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  
13.Crouch ER, Crouch ER Jr., Pressman SH. Prospective analysis of pediatric pseudophakia: myopic shift and postoperative outcomes. J AAPOS 2002;6:277-282.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Vasavada AR, Nihalani BR Pediatric cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006;17(1):54-61.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Autrata R, Rehurek J, Vodickov· K. Visual results after primary intraocular lens implantation or contact lens correction for aphakia in the first year of age. Ophthalmologica 2005;219(2):72-79.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Bardorf CM, Epley KD, Lueder GT, Tychsen L. Pediatric transscleral sutured intraocular lenses: efficacy and safety in 43 eyes followed an average of 3 years. J AAPOS. 2004;8(4):318-324.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Tsunoda K, Migita M, Nakashizuka T, Kozhuka T. Treatment of anterior vitreous before suturing an intraocular lens to the ciliary sulcus. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996;22:222-226.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Lubniewski AJ, Holland EJ, Van Meter WS, et al. Histologic study of eyes with transsclerally sutured posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;110:237-243.  Back to cited text no. 18  [PUBMED]  
19.Zetterstrom C, Lundvall A, Weeber H Jr, Jeeves M. Sulcus fixation without capsular support in children. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:776-781.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Lewis J. Sulcus fixation without flaps. Ophthalmology 1993;100:1346-1350.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Heilskov T, Joondeph BC, Olsen KR, Blankenship GW. Late endophthalmitis after transscleral fixation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens [case report]. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:1427.  Back to cited text no. 21  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Patients and Methods
    Results
    Discussion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2251    
    Printed169    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded239    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal