|SYMPOSIUM - UVEITIS UPDATE
|Year : 2009 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 245-251
Inflammatory choroidal neovascularization
Piergiorgio Neri1, Marta Lettieri2, Cinzia Fortuna2, Mara Manoni2, Alfonso Giovannini2
1 The Eye Clinic-Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I-G.M. Lancisi-G. Salesi-Ancona, Italy
2 The Eye Clinic-Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I-G.M. Lancisi-G. Salesi-Ancona; Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
|Date of Web Publication||19-Dec-2009|
Via Conca 71, 60020 Torrette-Ancona
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Purpose and Methods: Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) can be a severe sight-threatening sequela, which can be secondary to both infectious and noninfectious uveitis. This review summarizes the different diseases associated with CNV, highlighting new treatment modalities and the possible strategies, which could be applied for the therapy of this occurrence.
Results: Since CNV can often originate from posterior pole lesions and can be hard to identify, an accurate examination is mandatory in order to identify the correct diagnosis. In the majority of cases, fluorescein angiography (FA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) enable the determination of the clinical characteristics of the CNV. An infectious disease should be looked for to include a suitable therapy when available. The treatment strategy for CNV secondary to noninfectious uveal inflammations should be directed at controlling the inflammatory process. Systemic corticosteroids with or without immunosuppressive agents are indicated even when the CNV occurs with apparently inactive uveitis: Chronic subclinical inflammation can be the basis for the pathogenesis of CNV. Additional therapies aimed directly at the neovascular process, such as the intravitreal anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) agents, are recommended particularly when the therapy shows an insufficient response.
Conclusion: CNV secondary to uveitis is a severe sequela leading to significant visual impairment. ICGA is mandatory in order to obtain relevant information about the choroidal status. Several therapeutic options have been considered, but no guidelines are provided at the moment. Moreover, the current data are still only based on case reports or small series. For such reasons, further trials are mandatory to validate the preliminary available results.
Keywords: Choroidal Neovascularization, Choroiditis, Immunosuppression, Steroids, Uveitis, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
|How to cite this article:|
Neri P, Lettieri M, Fortuna C, Manoni M, Giovannini A. Inflammatory choroidal neovascularization. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2009;16:245-51
|How to cite this URL:|
Neri P, Lettieri M, Fortuna C, Manoni M, Giovannini A. Inflammatory choroidal neovascularization. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2020 May 27];16:245-51. Available from: http://www.meajo.org/text.asp?2009/16/4/245/58422
| Introduction|| |
Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is one of the most severe causes of visual impairment in patients with uveitis. When the disruption of the homeostasis between the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and Bruch's membrane occurs, a vicious circle leads to the choroidal neo-angiogenesis. Both noninfectious and infectious uveitis can have CNV as a possible sequela: Infectious uveitis is due to infective agents that directly affect the retino-choroidal space whereas noninfectious uveitis is likely to be an autoinflammatory disease.
The imbalance between inhibitory  and stimulatory  action of the soluble mediators produced by the RPE  is supposed to be the trigger of the neoangiogenesis.
The animal models  proved that neovessels occur, even if inflammation is not evident.
Often, biomicroscopy and fluorescein angiography (FA) may not be sufficient to explore the choroidal status: Only choroidal foci of significant size causing alterations of the retina red reflex can be detected through the screen of the RPE by funduscopy and/or FA.
For these reasons, indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) is mandatory to show choroidal abnormalities. Choroidal inflammation was reclassified according to the structures that are predominantly involved in the inflammatory process due to ICGA. Since choriocapillaris non-perfusion involve the chorioretinal interface, the RPE and outer retina, the production of inflammatory mediators induces the VEGF release and, consequently, the CNV pathogenesis.
Choroidal neovessels grow into the sub-RPE space or into the subretinal space.  The location, the growth pattern and the type of CNV depend on the patient's age and the underlying disease, albeit uveitic CNV is typically the type 2. Bleeding and exudation can occur with further growth, accounting for the visual symptoms.
As previously stated, CNV can be the sequela of both infectious and noninfectious uveitis; in the infectious diseases, Toxoplasmosis,  Toxocara canis,  Tuberculosis,  viral retinopathies,  can have CNV as synchronous or asynchronous sequela.
As well as infectious uveitis, noninfectious uveitis has been associated with CNV also; punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC), multifocal choroiditis (MFC), acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE) and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease are some of the disorders that are associated with CNV occurrence.
In the following sections the major uveitis issues will be reviewed; posterior infectious and noninfectious uveitis entities most often associated with CNV will be reported.
| Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Infectious Uveitis|| |
Many protozoa can infect the eye: Trypanosome,  leishmania  and pneumocystis carinii  have been described as possible parasites affecting the retina. Toxoplasma gondii  is the protozoan that most commonly affects the eye and the only one that has been associated with CNV occurrence. Toxoplasma gondii belongs to the genus Toxoplasma and is a ubiquitous, endocellular parasite in humans. -
Until recently congenitally acquired toxoplasmosis was thought to make up for the majority of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis, at this time, the acquired disease seems to be the most common type of ocular toxoplasmosis. ,
Association between toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis and CNV is relatively frequent.  CNV typically grows close to the edge of an atrophic chorioretinal scar, although CNV can rarely be synchronous with an active disease. In such cases, FA is always useful to prove the CNV, in order to distinguish the neovascular lesion from the reactivation of retinochoroiditis. The peculiar angiographic findings of the choroiditis are early hypofluorescence and late staining for the atrophic areas and late hypofluorescence when pigment clumps are present. The adjacent CNV has the typical dirty gray appearance on biomicroscopy [Figure 1], presenting an early hyperfluorescence and late leakage on FA; in very rare cases, CNV can occur concomitantly with a reactivation of retinochoroiditis.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) can play a role in order to appreciate the CNV  and can show fluid within the adjacent or overlying retina.
As far as treatment is concerned, in the rare cases where CNV is associated with recurrent retinochoroiditis, the classical association of anti-toxoplasmic antibiotics with corticosteroids should be given. 
The available options for the treatment of CNV associated with toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis were limited to laser therapy  and photodynamic therapy (PDT)  in the recent past. Actually, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)  therapy seems to offer the better outcome and is considered the most reasonable option for such disease [Figure 2].
The bacteria can also affect the eye, and CNV can rarely be one of the most severe sequela. ,,,,,,,,, The retinal colonization can occur by metastasizing the choroid during endocarditis, aortic valve infection, renal and bone abscess and intravenous drug abuse.
Classic CNV is generally the typical occurrence in bacterial endocarditis, which grows close to the primary chorioretinal lesion, or in neighboring area of an old atrophic scar.
Recently, viruses have been associated with CNV, predominantly as a late complication. ,,,
The most recent virus associated with CNV is the West Nile virus: In 2006, Khairallah et al.  described a case with an extensive ischemic capillaropathy in the macula which, a few months later, developed a choroidal neovascularization near a chorioretinal scar.
Although most types of fungi, such as Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans and Aspergillus fumigatus, have been described as potential pathogen for the eye; rarely CNV can be a late sequela and no treatment strategies are available at the moment.
Many parasitic worms, called helminthes, can potentially affect the eyes, although Toxocara canis only may rarely provoke choroidal lesions leading to CNV. The choroidal neovascular membrane typically grows near an active or quiescent choroidal granuloma. FA typically shows hyperfluorescence and late leakage of the dye, while the ICGA can demonstrate an occult CNV underlying the area close to the granuloma. 
The majority of infectious uveitis associated with CNV, except ocular toxoplasmosis, are generally reports or small case series and no guidelines are provided on a possible therapeutic strategy.
The therapy is based on the association of systemic drugs and other techniques, such as argon laser photocoagulation, PDT, surgical removal and intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs. On the basis of the data emerging from the anecdotal cases recently described, intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs seem to be the best option with or without other systemic medications; they may offer a less aggressive control of the CNV, reducing the risk of exuberant scarring and optimizing the outcome of the disease.
| Noninfectious Uveitis and Choroidal Neovascular Membrane|| |
Noninfectious uveitis can affect the posterior pole leading to severe sequela and threatening the visual function.
CNV is commonly associated with MFC, which is found in 32 to 46% of patients. ,, In 1973, Nozik and Dorsch reported  two cases resembling POHS, which were characterized by multifocal choroidal spots and panuveitis. More than 10 years later, Dreyer and Gass described 28 additional cases with anterior uveitis, vitritis and multiple lesions in the posterior pole, which they called 'multifocal choroiditis and panuveitis'. At this time, this disease is commonly called multifocal choroiditis, since the panuveitis is not usually present. CNV secondary to MFC is generally located anterior to the RPE, in the macular region or in the peripapillary area. It has been postulated that CNV is very frequent in MFC because of the widespread involvement of the choriocapillaris.
CNV secondary to MFC is more frequent in inflamed areas, albeit this may originate from an old chorioretinal scar also. Low-grade chronic inflammation can be the core of this process and ICGA frequently shows large areas of non-perfusion indicating ischemia, which may be the trigger of angiogenesis. In such cases, ICGA is essential in the evaluation of the choroidal status. 
Although few studies have been published, OCT can play a role; this technique may study the position of CNV with reference to the RPE and can detect fluid in the overlying or adjacent retina.
PIC is another subtype of multifocal choroiditis, which presents multiple choroidal spots and, often, CNV.
Active, yellowish spots can be characterized by an overlying serous detachment of the neurosensory retina,  corresponding to those areas where the patient complains of scotomas and/or metamorphopsia. Choroidal spots can change into faded chorioretinal lesions or atrophic chorioretinal scars. Yellowish lesions tend to depigment and to become yellow-whitish, surrounded by a hyperpigmented edge. CNV can originate near the border of focal chorioretinal scars.
CNV is a common sequela of PIC; the occurrence is estimated at 17 to 40% of eyes, leading to severe and permanent visual impairment. , As in MFC, ICGA is mandatory to prove choroidal involvement. 
In 1932, Junius  introduced the term 'peripapillary retinochoroiditis' to describe a posterior pole intraocular inflammation, presenting a serpiginous pattern. Several reports added more cases in the following years, , and serpiginous choroiditis (SC) became a distinguished entity.
Serpiginous choroiditis is a rare, severe, recurrent and, usually, bilateral disease, which is thought to primarily involve the choriocapillaris, and secondarily the RPE and the rest of the choroid.  The disease typically starts from the peripapillary area and progresses centrifugally to the macula, assuming the typical serpiginous pattern. CNV is a well-known complication of SC in 10 - 25% of affected patients, ,,, generally occurring close to the edge of chorioretinal lesions.
FA is mandatory to detect the CNV, since this cannot be easily recognized during the active stage of the disease.
Since FA usually underestimates the choroidal involvement, ICGA is needed in order to evaluate choroidal status and for the longitudinal management of SC. Indocyanine green angiography allows far better delineation of subretinal lesions than corresponding fluorescein frames, showing subclinical abnormalities of the choroid appearing as hyperfluorescent areas in the late phases of ICGA with a weak leakage. 
One of the most peculiar types of multifocal choroiditis is the presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (POHS). Although the trigger of choroiditis is an infectious disease due to the Histoplasma Capsulatum, POHS seems to be an immune reaction to the pathogen affecting the retina. POHS is characterized by disciform macular detachment associated with peripheral chorioretinal scars and peripapillary atrophy, which are the classical triad of this disease.  The primary cause of visual impairment in POHS is the occurrence of CNV in the macula, which results in exudation and subsequent scarring. Since the disease can be identified as an autoinflammatory disorder, Dees et al.  reported the use of immunosuppressive agents for the control of CNV secondary to POHS; patients were treated with the association of steroids, cyclosporine A and, in some cases, azathioprine, achieving a good control in all cases considered.
Even though the diseases mentioned above are more frequently associated with CNV, theoretically, any posterior uveitis can be complicated by choroidal neoangiogenesis. Subretinal fibrosis and uveitis syndrome  (SFU), APMPPE,  birdshot retinochoroidopathy,  multiple evanescent white dots syndrome (MEWDS), , VKH,  sympathetic ophthalmia (SO)  and Sarcoidisis  are some of the noninfectious uveitis that can present CNV as a possible sequela. Similarly to infectious uveitis, Type 2 membranes are the most common neovascular subset occurring in noninfectious uveitis.
The subtle choroidal inflammation can be the promoter of the neoangiogenic process, even for those CNVs, which apparently have not an evident choroidal inflammation. This is the case of the so-called idiopathic choroidal neovascularization (ICNV), where the CNV is the only reliable finding in the retina and no other abnormalities are detectable. FA is not contributory in understanding a clinical pattern, which can be evocative of posterior pole ocular inflammation. The role of inflammation in the pathophysiology of ICNV has been hypothesized on the basis of ICGA,  further supported by the preceding publications, which showed CNV as a possible sequela.  The supposed role of inflammation in ICNV is important for the treatment strategy, more than in other CNVs, ICNV should be treated as an inflammatory neovascularization. 
The strategy for the control of noninfectious uveitic CNV is evolving, although the core of the therapy is still based on the suppression of the triggering inflammation. The histopathological features, the pathophysiology and the preliminary results of some studies suggest a relatively unique method for the management of all the subtypes of CNV secondary to noninfectious uveitis. 
Since no guideline for the management of inflammatory CNV is provided, there is not a generally agreed method to treat uveitic CNV. All the proposed techniques present the results as safe and effective, but it is not clear which one could offer more advantages; no randomized control trials are available on the direct comparison between different therapies, and no trials on CNVs secondary to a specific uveitis entities are available.
Several techniques have been proposed for the management of CNVs, such as laser photocoagulation,  periocular and systemic steroids,  PDT, , immunosuppression  and surgical removal. 
Since the inflammatory process is not only loco-regional and the whole immune system appears to be involved,  the use of systemic steroids should be always considered.
The safety and efficacy of immunosuppression  for the control of choroidal new vessels in uveitis have been described [Figure 3] and [Figure 4]. The choice of the immunosuppressant should be established on the basis of the characteristics of the drug itself; some immunosuppressive drugs, such as cyclosporine A,  FK506 and Sirolimus  are known to produce nephrotoxicity, , inducing the overexpression of soluble mediators that have an important role in CNV pathogenesis.  Recently, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has proven to be effective in reducing such bio-mechanisms,  improving arteriolopathy and decreasing the amount of soluble mediators involved in CNV pathophysiology. For such reasons, MMF can be a promising drug for the long-term control of inflammatory CNV. 
When PDT was introduced, the laser treatment deeply changed, limiting argon laser photocoagulation to extrafoveal neovascular membranes to reduce the risk of iatrogenic damage. PDT has been used following different strategies; some patients have been treated electively with medical therapy and PDT,  while others received the PDT when they did not achieve the control of CNV with other strategies.  At this time, PDT has only a marginal role and the new anti-VEGF drugs have a prominent position in the management of inflammatory CNV. 
The same is true for surgical removal of CNV; after the introduction of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs,  surgery is indicated only for extensive peripapillary membranes,  albeit such technique was reported previously as safe and effective. 
Although there are no direct comparisons between different treatments, the rationale may suggest medical treatment as first choice for juxta/subfoveal CNV and, when this fails in controlling the CNV activity, anti-VEGF intravitreal drugs should be considered.
| Conclusion|| |
Uveitic CNV is a rare but severe complication of uveal inflammation. In most cases the clinical findings obtained by FA, ICGA and OCT allow to establish accurately the characteristics of the CNV. In case of active inflammation, an infectious disease should be looked for to include a suitable therapy when available. Regarding noninfectious uveitis, the treatment strategy should be aimed at controlling inflammation with the support of steroids, usually given systemically but sometimes also locally in unilateral disease, and/or immunosuppressants. Corticosteroids with or without immunosuppressants are suggested also for those CNVs associated with apparent inactive inflammatory disease; subclinical inflammation can be a subtle trigger and can generate the conditions for the occurrence of CNV. , However, additional therapies aimed directly at the neovascular process are recommended, particularly in severe cases; if steroids with or without immunosuppressive therapy show an insufficient response, anti-VEGF therapy should be rapidly introduced. Argon laser photocoagulation should probably be avoided even in CNV outside the fovea, because intravitreal administration of anti-VEGF therapy is more effective and offers a better long-lasting action. Similarly, PDT seems to be no match to anti-VEGF drugs and recent evidences direct the clinician to use these new types of treatments. However, as for all other methods evaluated, these results are still only based on case reports or small series. For the reasons above, further trials possibly multicentric, randomized and controlled are mandatory to validate these preliminary results.
| References|| |
|1.||Glaser BM, Campochiaro PA, Davis JL Jr, Jerdan JA. Retinal pigment epithelial cells release inhibitors of neovascularization. Ophthalmology 1987;94:780-4. |
|2.||Wong HC, Boulton M, McLeod D, Bayly M, Clark P, Marshall J. Retinal pigment epithelium in culture produce retinal vascular mitogens. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:1439-43. |
|3.||Ambati J, Ambati BK, Yoo SH, Ianchulev S, Adamis AP. Age-related macular degeneration: Etiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic strategies. Surv Ophthalmol 2003;48:257-93. |
|4.||Forrester JV, Liversidge J, Dua HS, Towler H, McMenamin PG. Comparison of clinical experimental uveitis. Curr Eye Res 1990;9:75-84. |
|5.||Grossniklaus HE, Gass JD. Clinicopathologic correlations of surgically excised type 1 and type 2 submacular choroidal neovascular membranes. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:59-69. |
|6.||Fine SL, Owens SL, Haller JA, Knox DL, Patz A. Choroidal neovascularization as a late complication of ocular toxoplasmosis. Am J Ophthalmol 1981;91:318-22. |
|7.||Lampariello DA, Primo SA. Ocular toxocariasis: A rare presentation of a posterior pole granuloma with an associated choroidal neovascular membrane. J Am Optom Assoc 1999;70:245-52. |
|8.||Chung YM, Yeh TS, Sheu SJ, Liu JH. Macular subretinal neovascularization in choroidal tuberculosis. Ann Ophthalmol 1989;21:225-9. |
|9.||Deutman AF, Grizzard WS. Rubella retinopathy and subretinal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol 1978;85:82-7. |
|10.||Matsumoto SC, Labovsky V, Roncoroni M, Guida MC, Giménez L, Mitelman J, et al. Retinal dysfunction in patients with chronic Chagas' disease is associated to anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies that cross-react with rhodopsin. FASEB J 2006;20:550-2. |
|11.||Montero JA, Ruiz-Moreno JM, Sanchis E. Intraretinal hemorrhage associated with leishmaniasis. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2003;34:212-4. |
|12.||Henderly DE, Genstler AJ, Smith RE, Rao NA. Changing patterns of uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;103:131-6. |
|13.||Smith RE, Nozik RA. Uveitis: A clinical approach to diagnosis and management. 2 nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1989. p. 128-34. |
|14.||Bahia-Oliveira LM, Jones JL, Azevedo-Silva J, Alves CC, Oréfice F, Addiss DG. Highly endemic, waterborne toxoplasmosis in north Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis 2003;9:55-62. |
|15.||Nussenblatt RB, Belfort R Jr. Ocular toxoplasmosis. An old disease revisited. JAMA 1994;271:304-7. |
|16.||Burnett AJ, Shortt SG, Isaac-Renton J, King A, Werker D, Bowie WR. Multiple cases of acquired toxoplasmosis retinitis presenting in an outbreak. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1032-7. |
|17.||Delair E, Monnet D, Grabar S, Dupouy-Camet J, Yera H, Brézin AP. Respective roles of acquired and congenital infections in presumed ocular toxoplasmosis. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146:851-5. |
|18.||Oréfice JL, Costa RA, Oréfice F, Campos W, da Costa-Lima D Jr, Scott IU. Vitreoretinal morphology in active ocular toxoplasmosis: A prospective study by optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:773-80. |
|19.||Rothova A, Meenken C, Buitenhuis HJ, Brinkman CJ, Baarsma GS, Boen-Tan TN, et al. Therapy for ocular toxoplasmosis. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;115:517-23. |
|20.||Recurrent choroidal neovascularization after argon laser photocoagulation for neovascular maculopathy. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:503- 12. |
|21.||Neri P, Mercanti L, Mariotti C, Salvolini S, Giovannini A. Long-term control of choroidal neovascularization in quiescent congenital toxoplasma retinochoroiditis with photodynamic therapy: 4-year results. Int Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan 28. [Epub ahead of print]. |
|22.||Ben Yahia S, Herbort CP, Jenzeri S, Hmidi K, Attia S, Messaoud R, Khairallah M. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) as primary and rescue treatment for choroidal neovascularization secondary to ocular toxoplasmosis. Int Ophthalmol 2008;28:311-6. |
|23.||Munier F, Othenin-Girard P. Subretinal neovascularization secondary to choroidal septic metastasis from acute bacterial endocarditis. Retina 1992;12:108-12. |
|24.||Wu CW, Yang CS, Chang HM, Lee FL, Hsu WM. Metastatic choroidal abscess and choroidal neovascularization in a patient with Staphylococcus aureus renal abscess. Eye 2006;20:265-8. |
|25.||Coll GE, Lewis H. Metastatic choroidal abscess and choroidal neovascular membrane associated with Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in a heroin user. Retina 1994;14:256-9. |
|26.||Cimino L, Herbort CP, Aldigeri R, Salvarani C, Boiardi L. Tuberculous uveitis, a resurgent and underdiagnosed disease. Int Ophthalmol 2007;29:67-74. |
|27.||Dye C, Scheele S, Dolin P, Pathania V, Raviglione MC. Global burden of tuberculosis: Estimated incidence, prevalence, and mortality by country: WHO Global Surveillance and Monitoring Project. JAMA 1999;282:677-86. |
|28.||Global tuberculosis control: WHO report 2001. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. (WHO/CDS/TB/2001.287) |
|29.||Dolin PJ, Raviglione MC, Kochi A. Global tuberculosis incidence and mortality during 1990-2000. Bull World Health Organ 1994;72:213-20. |
|30.||Advancing toward elimination. In: Geiter L, editor. Ending negleet: The elimination of tuberculosis in the United States. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2000. p. 86-121. |
|31.||Gur S, Silverstone BZ, Zylberman R, Berson D. Chorioretinitis and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Ann Ophthalmol 1987;19:112-5. |
|32.||Chung YM, Yeh TS, Sheu SJ, Liu JH. Macular subretinal neovascularization in choroidal tuberculosis. Ann Ophthalmol 1989;21:225-9. |
|33.||Frank KE, Purnell EW. Subretinal neovascularization following rubella retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1978;86:462-6. |
|34.||Hirano K, Tanikawa A, Miyake Y. [Neovascular maculopathy associated with rubella retinopathy] Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2000;104:431-6. |
|35.||Hirano K, Tanikawa A, Miyake Y. Neovascular maculopathy associated with rubella retinopathy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2000;44:697. |
|36.||Wang LK, Kansal S, Pulido JS. Photodynamic therapy for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization secondary to rubella retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134:790-2. |
|37.||Khairallah M, Ben Yahia S, Attia S, Jelliti B, Zaouali S, Ladjimi A. Severe ischemic maculopathy in a patient with West Nile virus infection. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2006;37:240-2. |
|38.||Lampariello DA, Primo SA. Ocular toxocariasis: A rare presentation of a posterior pole granuloma with an associated choroidal neovascular membrane. J Am Optom Assoc 1999;70:245-52. |
|39.||Dreyer RF, Gass DJ. Multifocal choroiditis and panuveitis. A syndrome that mimics ocular histoplasmosis. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1776-84. |
|40.||Morgan CM, Schatz H. Recurrent multifocal choroiditis. Ophthalmology 1986;93:1138-47. |
|41.||Brown J Jr, Folk JC, Reddy CV, Kimura AE. Visual prognosis of multifocal choroiditis, punctate inner choroidopathy, and the diffuse subretinal fibrosis syndrome. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1100-5. |
|42.||Nozik RA, Dorsch W. A new chorioretinopathy associated with anterior uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1973;76:758-62. |
|43.||Slakter JS, Giovannini A, Yannuzzi LA, Scassellati-Sforzolini B, Guyer DR, Sorenson JA, et al. Indocyanine green angiography of multifocal choroiditis. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1813-9. |
|44.||Watzke RC, Packer AJ, Folk JC, Benson WE, Burgess D, Ober RR. Punctate inner choroidopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1984;98:572-84. |
|45.||Reddy CV, Brown J Jr, Folk JC, Kimura AE, Gupta S, Walker J. Enlarged blind spots in chorioretinal inflammatory disorders. Ophthalmology 1996;103:606-17. |
|46.||Altan-Yaycioglu R, Akova YA, Akca S, Yilmaz G. Inflammation of the posterior uvea: Findings on fundus fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2006;14:171-9. |
|47.||Hardy RA, Schatz H. Macular geographic helicoid choroidopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1237-42. |
|48.||Hamilton AM, Bird AC. Geographical choroidopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 1974;58:784-97. |
|49.||Chisholm IH, Gass JD, Hutton WL. The late stage of serpiginous (geographic) choroiditis. Am J Ophthalmol 1976;82:343-51. |
|50.||Kuo IC, Cunningham ET Jr. Ocular neovascularization in patients with uveitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2000;40:111-26. |
|51.||Jampol LM, Orth D, Daily MJ, Rabb MF. Subretinal neovascularization with geographic (serpiginous) choroiditis. Am J Ophthalmol 1979;88:683-9. |
|52.||Erkkila H, Laatikainen L. Subretinal and disc neovascularization in serpiginous choroiditis. Br J Ophthalmol 1982;66:326-31. |
|53.||Blumenkranz MS, Gass JD, Clarkson JG. Atypical serpiginous choroiditis. Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100:1773-5. |
|54.||Giovannini A, Ripa E, Scassellati-Sforzolini B, Ciardella A, Tom D, Yannuzzi L. Indocyanine green angiography in serpiginous choroidopathy. Eur J Ophthalmol 1996;6:299-306. |
|55.||Dees C, Arnold JJ, Forrester JV, Dick AD. Immunosuppressive treatment of choroidal neovascularization associated with endogenous posterior uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1456- 61. |
|56.||Brown J Jr, Folk JC, Reddy CV, Kimura AE. Visual prognosis of multifocal choroiditis, punctate inner choroidopathy, and the diffuse subretinal fibrosis syndrome. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1100-5. |
|57.||Pagliarini S, Piguet B, Ffytche TJ, Bird AC. Foveal involvement and lack of visual recovery in APMPPE associated with uncommon features. Eye 1995;9:42-7. |
|58.||Brucker AJ, Deglin EA, Bene C, Hoffman ME. Subretinal choroidal neovascularization in birdshot retinochoroidopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1985;99:40-4. |
|59.||Rouvas AA, Ladas ID, Papakostas TD, Moschos MM, Vergados I. Intravitreal ranibizumab in a patient with choroidal neovascularization secondary to multiple evanescent white dot syndrome. Eur J Ophthalmol 2007;17:996-9. |
|60.||Löw U, Palmowski AM, Weich CM, Ruprecht KW. [Choroidal neovascularization followed in a patient with "Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome" (MEWDS) - a case report] Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2004;221:1051-3. |
|61.||Read RW, Rechodouni A, Butani N, Johnston R, LaBree LD, Smith RE, et al. Complications and prognostic factors in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:599-606. |
|62.||Kilmartin DJ, Forrester JV, Dick AD. Cyclosporine-induced resolution of choroidal neovascularization associated with sympathetic ophthalmia. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:249-50. |
|63.||Inagaki M, Harada T, Kiribuchi T, Ohashi T, Majima J. Subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in uveitis. Ophthalmologica 1996;210:229-33. |
|64.||Giovannini A, Scassellati-Sforzolini B, Mariotti C, D'Altobrando E. Indocyanine green angiography findings in idiopathic choroidal neovascularization. Int Ophthalmol 1996-97;20:171-9. |
|65.||Giovannini A, Neri P, Mercanti L, Bruè C. Photodynamic treatment versus photodynamic treatment associated with systemic steroids for idiopathic choroidal neovascularization. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:620-3. |
|66.||Perentes Y, Van Tran T, Sickenberg M, Herbort CP. Subretinal neovascular membranes complicating uveitis: Frequency, treatments, and visual outcome. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2005;13:219-24. |
|67.||Olk RJ, Burgess DB. Treatment of recurrent juxtafoveal subretinal neovascular membranes with krypton red laser photocoagulation. Ophthalmology 1985;92:1035-46. |
|68.||Flaxel CJ, Owens SL, Mulholland B, Schwartz SD, Gregor ZJ. The use of corticosteroids for choroidal neovascularization in young patients. Eye 1998;12:266-72. |
|69.||Hogan A, Behan U, Kilmartin DJ. Outcomes after combination photodynamic therapy and immunosuppression for inflammatory subfoveal choroidal neovascularization. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1109-11. |
|70.||Leslie T, Lois N, Christopoulou D, Olson JA, Forrester JV. Photodynamic therapy for inflammatory choroidal neovascularization unresponsive to immunosuppression. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:147-50. |
|71.||Lit ES, Kim RY, Damico DJ. Surgical removal of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization without removal of posterior hyaloid: A consecutive series in younger patients. Retina 2001;21:317-23. |
|72.||Caicedo A, Espinosa-Heidmann DG, Piña Y, Hernandez EP, Cousins SW. Blood-derived macrophages infiltrate the retina and activate Muller glial cells under experimental choroidal neovascularization. Exp Eye Res 2005;81:38-47. |
|73.||Disel U, Pavdas S, Dogan A, Gulfiliz G, Yavuz S. Effect of colchicine on cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, reduction of TGF-beta overexpression, apoptosis, and oxidative damage: An experimental animal study. Transplant Proc 2004;36:1372-6. |
|74.||Ninova D, Covarrubias M, Rea DJ, Park WD, Grande JP, Stegall MD. Acute nephrotoxicity of tacrolimus and sirolimus in renal isografts: Differential intragraft expression of transforming growth factor-beta1 and alpha-smooth muscle actin. Transplantation 2004;78:338-44. |
|75.||Reddy VM, Zamora RL, Kaplan HJ. Distribution of growth factors in subfoveal neovascular membranes in age related macular degeneration and presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:291-301. |
|76.||Shihab FS, Bennett WM, Yi H, Choi SO, Andoh TF. Mycophenolate mofetil ameliorates arteriolopathy and decreases transforming growth factor-beta1 in chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Am J Transplant 2003;3:1550-9. |
|77.||Neri P, Manoni M, Fortuna C, Lettieri M, Mariotti C, Giovannini A. Association of systemic steroids and mycophenolate mofetil as rescue therapy for uveitic choroidal neovascularization unresponsive to the traditional immunesuppressants: Interventional case series. Int Ophthalmol 2009 Sep 2. [Epub ahead of print] |
|78.||Tran TH, Fardeau C, Terrada C, Ducos De Lahitte G, Bodaghi B, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab for refractory choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to uveitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:1685-92. |
|79.||Almony A, Thomas MA, Atebara NH, Holekamp NM, Del Priore LV. Long-term Follow-up of Surgical Removal of Extensive Peripapillary Choroidal Neovascularization in Presumed Ocular Histoplasmosis Syndrome. Ophthalmology 2008;115:540-5. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]