|Year : 2010 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 365-368
Corneal crosslinking for keratoconus in Iranian patients: Outcomes at 1 year following treatment
Ladan Saffarian1, Hamid Khakshoor2, Mehran Zarei-Ghanavati2, Habibollah Esmaily3
1 Islamic Azad University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2 Eye Research Center of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Khatam-al-Anbia eye Hospital, Mashhad, Iran
3 Faculty of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
|Date of Web Publication||13-Oct-2010|
Khatam-Al-Anbia Eye Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashad
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Aim and Design: A retrospective, nonrandomized, single-center clinical study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus in Iranian patients 12 months after CXL.
Settings: This study was carried out at Navid Didegan Eye Center, a private clinic, Mashhad, Iran.
Materials and Methods: Ninety-two eyes of 53 subjects with progressive keratoconus were evaluated in this study. All eyes completed 1-year follow-up. The outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), sphere and cylinder refraction, keratometry, and corneal thickness. Comparison of baseline and 1-year postoperative data is reported in this study. The Wilcoxon signed-ranked and Student's t-tests were used for statistical analyses. P < 0.05 was statistically significant.
Results: The mean age was 21.5 ± 3.4 years (range, 16 -30 years). Thirty-one (58.5%) of the subjects were men and 22 (41.5%) were women. Mean baseline UCVA and BSCVA were 0.61 ± 0.31 and 0.06 ± 0.12 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR), respectively. One year postoperatively UCVA was 0.31 ± 0.25 logMAR and BSCVA was 0.0 ± 0.01 logMAR. UCVA and BSCVA were statistically higher postoperatively (P < 0.001, both parameters). The mean astigmatism decreased by 0.78 ± 1.49 diopter (D) with significant variation during the follow-up period (P < 0.001). Mean baseline simulated keratometry (SIM K) was 46.94 ± 2.37 D and decreased to 46.0 ± 2.33 D on year postoperatively (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Corneal CXL seems to be efficient in stabilization of progressive keratoconus progression in Iranian patients at 1 year of followup.
Keywords: Cornea, Crosslinking, Progressive Keratoconus, Riboflavin, Ultraviolet A
|How to cite this article:|
Saffarian L, Khakshoor H, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Esmaily H. Corneal crosslinking for keratoconus in Iranian patients: Outcomes at 1 year following treatment. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2010;17:365-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Saffarian L, Khakshoor H, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Esmaily H. Corneal crosslinking for keratoconus in Iranian patients: Outcomes at 1 year following treatment. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2010 [cited 2021 Nov 28];17:365-8. Available from: http://www.meajo.org/text.asp?2010/17/4/365/71600
| Introduction|| |
Keratoconus, a non-inflammatory disease, is characterized by progressive corneal thinning that results in a conelike ectasia, irregular astigmatism, and decreased vision. The incidence of keratoconus is reported to be 1 in 2000 in the general population. , The onset is typically during puberty with slow progression.  The condition often presents unilaterally yet does ultimately affect both eyes.  Penetrating keratoplasty seems an essential surgical intervention in 20% of cases due to continued ectatic progression. 
Corneal crosslinking (CXL) treatment of keratoconus was first introduced by Wollensak et al. in 2003.  CXL has an effect on the biomechanical properties of corneal collagen.  Riboflavin, administered topically to de-epithelialized corneas, serves as a photosensitizer that is activated by UVA light. The light-induced production of oxygen radicals leads to the development of strong chemical bonds between collagen fibrils. With the aid of this new approach, stromal fiber photopolymerization enhances the corneal integrity and mechanical strength.  Therefore, it may be considered as halting keratectasia progression during the progressive phase of keratoconus. In contrast, modal therapies such as rigid contact lenses, intracorneal rings, photorefractive keratectomy, or epikeratoplasty can be used only to correct the refractive errors of disease rather than to stop the keratoconus progression. ,,,
The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of CXL in Iranian patients with progressive keratoconus, at 12 months after treatment.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Cohort description and study criteria
In this retrospective, nonrandomized study, the cohort comprised 92 eyes of 53 subjects with progressive keratoconus. All procedures were performed at the private clinic, Navid Didegan Eye Center in Iran by a single surgeon. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Inclusion criteria in this study were keratoconus progression and corneal thickness of ≥400 μm at the thinnest point. Our criteria for keratoconus progression were exactly the same as a previous study:  an increase in maximum keratometry (K) of 1.00 diopter (D) in 1 year; subject reports of deteriorating best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); or the need for new contact lens fitting more than once in 2 years.
Exclusion criteria were central or paracentral scars either in the epithelium or in the corneal stroma, corneal thickness less than 400 μm, collagen vessel diseases, active ophthalmic inflammation, a history of herpetic keratitis, current corneal infection, pregnancy and lactation, and severe dry eye.
Examinations included measurement of uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity chart (ETDRS) with a logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) scale, dry, and cycloplegic refraction (after instillation of cyclopentolate 1%), slitlamp and funduscopic examinations, intraocular pressure with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Corneal topographic and pachymetry values were derived from Orbscan II (Bausch and Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA). Keratometry values reported in this study are the simulated keratometric values obtained with the Orbscan II.
After topical anesthesia (0.5% tetracaine), mechanical epithelium removal of the central 8 mm area of the cornea was performed with a surgical blade (≠15) under sterile conditions. Prior to UVA irradiation, riboflavin 0.1% solution (10 mg riboflavin in 10 mL dextran 20% solution) was instilled every 2 min for 24 min. Penetration of adequate riboflavin was confirmed by slitlamp examination with a blue filter.
A UV-X device (IROC, Zürich, Switzerland) was used to deliver UVA irradiation. The instrument was set at a safe working distance of 5 cm from the corneal surface with medium size UV rays aperture at the wavelength of 370 nm and a surface irradiance of 3 mW/cm 2 . During the surgical procedure, riboflavin solution was applied every 4 min. A calibrated UVA meter (LaserMate-Q, LASER 2000, Wessling, Germany) was used to control the desired levels of irradiance before each treatment.
After treatment, the patient received topical ciprofloxacin 0.30% and betamethasone 0.1% with an extended-wear night and day bandage contact lens (CIBA Vision, Duluth, GA, USA) until complete re-epithelialization of the cornea.
Postoperatively, all patients were given topical ciprofloxacin and betamethasone (four times a day) for the first week. Subsequently, betamethasone was replaced with fluorometholone given four times daily for 1 week and then tapered by one drop every week over 1 month until cessation.
Postoperative examinations were carried out at one day and 7 days and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The postexaminations were the same as the preoperative examinations.
The Wilcoxon signed-ranked and Students t-tests were used for statistical analyses with SPSS software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results as presented as mean values ± standard deviation. The threshold for statistical significance was set at a P-value less than 0.05. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative data are reported here.
| Results|| |
All patients completed 12 months postoperative follow-up. The mean age of the cohort was 21.5 ± 3.4 years (range, from 16-30 years). Thirty-one (58.5%) subjects were men and 22 (41.5%) were women.
The improvement in UCVA was observed in 88.2% of eyes. Fifty eyes (54.3%) gained three or more lines of UCVA and two eyes (2.1%) lost two lines. The mean UCVA significantly improved 12 months after surgery from 0.61 ± 0.31 logMAR to 0.31 ± 0.25 logMAR (P < 0.001) [Figure 1]. The mean BSCVA increased significantly from 0.06 ± 0.12 preoperatively to 0.0 ± 0.01 logMAR postoperatively and after 1 year (P < 0.001). Eight eyes (8.6%) gained three or more lines of BSCVA.
|Figure 1: Change in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) 12 months after corneal crosslinking with riboflavin for progressive keratoconus|
Click here to view
Patients were categorized into two groups: eyes with three lines or more of UCVA gain (Group 1) and eyes with no change or loss of UCVA (Group 2). The following preoperative parameters of the two groups were compared using independent t-test: age; sphere; cylinder; spherical equivalent (SE); mean keratometry; corneal pachymetry; UCVA; and BSCVA. Group 1 had higher astigmatism (mean = 4.29 ± 1.55) and lower UCVA (mean = 0.74 ± 0.22) compared to Group 2 (mean = 3.27 ±0.79 and mean = 0.36 ±0.30; respectively) (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for other parameters (P > 0.05, all parameters).
The mean preoperative sphere was -1.06 ± 1.92 D, the mean cylinder was -3.93 ± 1.67 D, and the mean SE was -3.01 ± 2.05 D. Postoperatively, the mean sphere was -0.87 ± 1.60 D, the mean cylinder was -3.14 ± 1.50 D, and SE was -2.43 ± 1.79 D. A mean decline of -0.18 ± 0.79 D was observed in spherical power (P > 0.05). There was a statistically significant decrease in cylindrical power of 0.78 ±1.49 D (P < 0.001). SE also demonstrated a mean reduction of 0.57 ± 1.04 D(P < 0.001).
The mean keratometry was 46.94 ± 2.37 D before CXL and decreased to 46.0 ± 2.33 D 1 year postoperatively. A significant decrease of 0.94 ± 0.71 D was noted 1 year postoperatively (P < 0.001).
Mean baseline corneal pachymetry was 460.68 ± 46.59 μm (range, 400 to 576 μm). One year postoperatively, the mean corneal thickness decreased significantly to 445.07 ± 41.57 μm (range, 395 to 570 μm) (P < 0.05).
No significant complications such as persistent epithelial defect, infectious keratitis, or corneal haze and cataract formation occurred during this study.
| Discussion|| |
Interest in corneal CXL and the number of centers offering this new treatment continue to rise day after day. Despite this fact, long-term clinical studies are rare that evaluate safety and efficacy of CXL among different ethnicities. Treatment response may be different among racial and ethnic groups. Hence, it is necessary to obtain a data studies such as ours prior to considering CXL a standard treatment for keratoconus.
Our study like other previous studies shows that CXL with riboflavin is effective in halting the progression of keratoconus. , For example, there was a mean decrease of 1 D in keratometric values in 90.5% of eyes in our study. Animal studies with quantitative biomechanical stress strain measurements have reported a significant increase in corneal rigidity porcine and rabbit corneas.  Studies on humans with keratoconus have demonstrated satisfactory short-term and long-term findings with substantial topographic and refractive improvement following treatment.  A considerable decline in topographic parameters such as keratometry, apical gradient curvature, inferior-superior index, cone area, and corneal aberrations after CXL has been reported. 
Similarly, we found an increase in UCVA and BSCVA was concomitant with topographic flattening and a decline in mean keratometry on year after CXL. Additionally, we found that patients with greater preoperative astigmatism and lower UCVA achieved a greater increase in UCVA after CXL. This outcome is consistent with Vinciguerra et al.,  who reported a statistically significant decrease in cylinder and improvement in UCVA and BSCVA after CXL in eyes with progressive keratoconus. Caporossi et al. illustrated that the mean SE declined 2.5 D, postoperatively. These results were topographically confirmed by a reduction in mean keratometry. Corneal aberrometry indicated improvements in corneal morphologic symmetry. 
No significant adverse effects were observed among the subjects in our study. In our study, all subjects had corneal thickness greater than 400 μm. Subjects with corneal pachymetry less than 400 μm were excluded on the basis of Wollensak et al.'s report that a standard surface UVA dose of 3 mW/cm has a toxic effect on endothelial cells of corneas thinner than 400 μm. 
CXL is a minimally invasive procedure. This novel method can halt or reduce keratoconus progression in comparison to other treatment approaches which only have a transient effect on refractive corrections. Therefore, CXL seems to be the primary approach to stop or decrease the progression of keratoconus. As keratoconus is prevalent in Iran and it is the most common cause of corneal transplantation in our country,  we believe that CXL can play a key role in reducing the necessity of corneal transplantation in keratoconus patients. Furthermore, there is added advantage of obviating the risks and complications associated with keratoplasty. The simplicity and minimal invasiveness of this procedure can precipitate a significant shift in treatment of progressive keratoconus in countries where the approach to corneal transplantation has various difficulties.
In conclusion, our study not only demonstrated a halt in keratoconus progression, but also showed a significant improvement in visual acuity and refractive results due to a decline in the irregular astigmatism after CXL. These outcomes provide an indication of the efficacy and safety of this new approach and the potential for CXL to be an appropriate therapy for progressive keratoconus among Iranian patients. However, further trials with longer follow-up are essential to confirm these encouraging results.
| References|| |
|1.||Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998;42:297-319. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|2.||Kennedy RH, Bourne WM, Dyer JA. A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;101:267-73. |
|3.||Tuft SJ, Moodaley LC, Gregory WM, Davison CR, Buckley RJ. Prognostic factors for progression of keratoconus. Ophthalmology 1994;101:439-47. [PUBMED] |
|4.||Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-A-induced collagen cross-linking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:620-7. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|5.||Rocha KM, Ramos-Esteban JC, Qian Y, Herekar S, Krueger RR. Comparative study of riboflavin-UVA cross-linking and "flash-linking" using surface wave elastometry. J Refract Surg 2008;24:S748-51. [PUBMED] |
|6.||Spoerl E, Huhle M, Seiler T. Induction of cross-links in corneal tissue. Exp Eye Res 1998;66:97-103. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|7.||Siganos CS, Kymionis GD, Kartakis N, Theodorakis MA, Astyrakakis N, Pallikaris IG. Management of kerataconus with intacs. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:64-70. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|8.||Colin J. European clinical evaluation: Use of intacs prescription inserts for the treatment of keratoconus. J Cataract Refrect Surg 2006;32:747-55. |
|9.||Cennamo G, Intravaja A, Boccuzzi D, Marotta G, Cennamo G. Treatment of keratoconus by topography-guided customized photorefractive keratectomy: Two-year follow-up study. J Refract Surg 2008;24:145-9. [PUBMED] |
|10.||Jaeger MJ, Berson P, Kaufman HE, Green WR. Epikeratoplasty for keratoconus. A clinicopathologic case report. Cornea 1987;6:131-9. [PUBMED] |
|11.||Agrawal VB. Corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and ultraviolet - A light for keratoconus: Results in Indian eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009;57:111-4. [PUBMED] |
|12.||Wollensak G. Corneal collagen crosslinking: New horizons. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 2010;5:201-15. |
|13.||Raiskup-Wolf F, Hoyer A, Spoerl E, Pillunat LE. Collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: Long-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:796-801. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|14.||Kohlhaas M, Spoerl E, Schilde T, Unger G, Wittig C, Pillunat LE. Biomechanical evidence of the distribution of cross-links in corneas treated with riboflavin and ultraviolet A light. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:279-83. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|15.||Caporossi A, Mazzotta C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi T. Long-term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in Italy: The Siena eye cross study. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:585-93. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|16.||Vinciguerra P, Albè E, Trazza S, Rosetta P, Vinciguerra R, Seiler T, et al. Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. Ophthalmology 2009;116:369-78. |
|17.||Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Wilsch M, Seiler T. Endothelial cell damage after riboflavin- ultraviolet: A treatment in the rabit. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1786-90. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|18.||Zare M, Javadi MA, Einollahi B, Baradaran-Rafii A, Zarei-Ghanavati S, Jamshidi-Farsani MR, et al. Indications for corneal transplantation at a tertiary referral center in Tehran. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2010;5:82-6. |
|This article has been cited by|
||Efficacy of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for the Treatment of Keratoconus
| ||Zohar Meiri,Shay Keren,Amir Rosenblatt,Tal Sarig,Liat Shenhav,David Varssano |
| ||Cornea. 2016; 35(3): 417 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking to halt the progression of keratoconus
| ||Stefan J. Lang,Elisabeth M. Messmer,Gerd Geerling,Marc J. Mackert,Tobias Brunner,Sylvia Dollak,Borislav Kutchoukov,Daniel Böhringer,Thomas Reinhard,Philip Maier |
| ||BMC Ophthalmology. 2015; 15(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Clinical results with two different pharmaceutical preparations of riboflavin in corneal cross-linking: an 18-month follow up
| ||Hassan Hashemi,Mohammad Seyedian,Mohammad Miraftab,Hooman Bahrmandy,Araz Sabzevari,Soheila Asgari |
| ||DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015; 23(1): 4 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Reshaping procedures for the surgical management of corneal ectasia
| ||Mohammed Ziaei,Allon Barsam,Neda Shamie,David Vroman,Terry Kim,Eric D. Donnenfeld,Edward J. Holland,John Kanellopoulos,Francis S. Mah,J. Bradley Randleman,Sheraz Daya,Jose Güell |
| ||Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2015; 41(4): 842 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Matched Comparison Study of Total and Partial Epithelium Removal in Corneal Cross-linking
| ||Hassan Hashemi,Mohammad Miraftab,Farhad Hafezi,Soheila Asgari |
| ||Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2015; 31(2): 110 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Epithelium-Off Photochemical Corneal Collagen Cross-Linkage Using Riboflavin and Ultraviolet A for Keratoconus and Keratectasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
| ||Joyce A. Craig,James Mahon,Ann Yellowlees,Teresa Barata,Julie Glanville,Mick Arber,Lakshmi Mandava,John Powell,Francisco Figueiredo |
| ||The Ocular Surface. 2014; 12(3): 202 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
| ||Tian Chunyu,Peng Xiujun,Fan Zhengjun,Zhang Xia,Zhou Feihu |
| ||Scientific Reports. 2014; 4 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||An Overview of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (CXL)
| ||George D. Kymionis,Dimitrios G. Mikropoulos,Dimitra M. Portaliou,Irini C. Voudouragkaki,Vassilios P. Kozobolis,Anastasios G. P. Konstas |
| ||Advances in Therapy. 2013; 30(10): 858 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Influence of Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus on Several Objective Parameters of Dry Eye
| ||Suphi Taneri,Saskia Oehler,George Asimellis,A. John Kanellopoulos |
| ||Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2013; 29(9): 612 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Corneal collagen crosslinking using UVA light and riboflavin for keratoconus
| ||Murugesan Vanathi,Ravi Bypareddy,Anita Panda |
| ||Expert Review of Ophthalmology. 2012; 7(1): 33 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|