About MEAJO | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions to authors | Online submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology
Users Online: 445   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
  Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 120-122  

Pixeye virtual reality training has the potential of enhancing proficiency of laser trabeculoplasty performed by medical students: A pilot study


Department of Ophthalmology, King Faisal University, King Fahad Hospital, PO Box 2247, Al-Hofuf, 31982, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Date of Web Publication20-Jan-2012

Correspondence Address:
Fahad Alwadani
Department of Ophthalmology, King Faisal University, King Fahad Hospital, PO Box 2247, Al-Hofuf, 31982
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-9233.92127

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Objective: To compare the surgical proficiency of medical students who underwent traditional training or virtual reality training for argon laser trabeculoplasty with the PixEye simulator.
Materials and Methods: The cohort comprised of 47 fifth year male medical students from the College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia. The cohort was divided into two groups: students (n = 24), who received virtual reality training (VR Group) and students (n = 23), who underwent traditional training (Control Group). After training, the students performed the trabeculoplasty procedure. All trainings were included concurrent power point presentations describing the details of the procedure. Evaluation of surgical performance was based on the following variables: missing the exact location with the laser, overtreatment, undertreatment and inadvertent laser shots to iris and cornea.
Results: The target was missed by 8% of the VR Group compared to 55% in the Control Group. Overtreatment and undertreatment was observed in 7% of the VR Group compared to 46% of the Control Group. Inadvertent laser application to the cornea or iris was performed by 4.5% of the VR Group compared to 34% of the Control Group.
Conclusion: Virtual reality training on PixEye simulator may enhance the proficiency of medical students and limit possible surgical errors during laser trabeculoplasty. The authors have no financial interest in the material mentioned in this study.

Keywords: Laser Trabeculoplasty, Medical Students, Pixeye Simulator, Virtual Reality Surgical Training


How to cite this article:
Alwadani F, Morsi MS. Pixeye virtual reality training has the potential of enhancing proficiency of laser trabeculoplasty performed by medical students: A pilot study. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2012;19:120-2

How to cite this URL:
Alwadani F, Morsi MS. Pixeye virtual reality training has the potential of enhancing proficiency of laser trabeculoplasty performed by medical students: A pilot study. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2023 Feb 6];19:120-2. Available from: http://www.meajo.org/text.asp?2012/19/1/120/92127


   Introduction Top


Argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) is one of the most effective modalities for treating open-angle glaucoma. [1],[2] For example, a success rate of almost 90% has been reported in open-angle glaucoma cases. [3],[4] The main complications of the procedure include intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes, post-laser uveitis and peripheral anterior synechia. [4],[5] These complications can be significantly minimized with appropriate training and accurate technique. [6],[7]

The PixEyes-Ophthalmic Simulator (SimEdge SA, Loos France) [Figure 1] is a virtual reality tutoring system as well as an ophthalmology disease simulator. It simulates training in real conditions for diagnosis and laser treatment of diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, retinal vascular diseases and glaucoma. PixEyes is primarily designed for the treatment of retinal disorders.
Figure 1: Pix eyes stimulator

Click here to view


Traditionally, surgical training for medical students at King Faisal University includes attending theoretical sessions, video-projection sessions, and then performing the surgical procedure on animal eyes. However, students using PixEyes during training can experience the full scope of surgery on a computer akin to the real world. [8],[9] PixEyes is controlled by advanced computer technology that records and assesses all surgical maneuvers and decisions made by a student performing laser on a virtual eye. The advantage of this virtual reality training is that it likely reduces student apprehension when dealing with an actual patient. This state of the art training in ophthalmology, thereby help build confidence in budding ophthalmologists. The main features of this simulator include realistic handling of a contact lens, binocular projection of realistic images, adjustments similar to a slit lamp (width, height, brightness, etc), and accurate simulation of laser (power, duration, micromanipulator, etc). PixEyes includes built-in expert and student models. The expert model is used by the consultant to create an expert method of treating certain diseases. This simulated model can be saved and used by student to learn how to diagnose the disease or to compare their performance with their tutoring consultant. The student model is to diagnose certain cases, save the work and send it to the instructor or to compare their work with the pre-simulated instructor models. Simulator-based assessments can offer immediate feedback and correction of errors. [9],[10],[11]


   Materials and Methods Top


This study was registered with the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and approval was granted by the ethics committee (EC) of King Faisal University.

The cohort comprised 47 male students in the fifth year of the Faculty of Medicine, King Faisal University. The students were randomly assigned to receive training by one of two methods: virtual training on the PixEye simulator (VR Group, n = 24) or traditional training only (Control Group, n = 23). The training was preceded by a Power Point (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) presentation describing the details of laser trabeculoplasty. Following completion of training, each student was observed performing trabeculoplasty. Proficiency at trabeculoplasty was delivering the laser shot to the exact location, overtreatment, undertreatment and accidental laser shots to the iris and cornea.

The PixEyes simulator is shown in [Figure 1]. Comparison of both groups was performed with Fisher's exact test.


   Results Top


Laser shot delivery to the exact location was missed by 8% of the VR Group and 55% of the Control Group. This difference was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.001). There was statistically significantly greater overtreatment and undertreatment by the Control Group (46%) compared to the VR Group (7%), (Fisher's Exact test, P = 0.015). There were statistically significantly lower inadvertent corneal or iris burns in the VR Group (4.5%) compared to the Control Group (34%) (Fisher's Exact test, P = 0.01) [Table 1].
Table 1: Errors in laser trabeculoplasty performed by 5th year medical students compared to traditional training

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Air pilots have been trained with virtual reality flight simulators for decades. These simulators have also been used to assess competency which is more cost effective than in-flight assessments. Recently, a number of surgical specialties have incorporated virtual reality simulation in surgical training programs. [9]

Laser photocoagulation plays a major role in ocular therapy. However the persistence of many postoperative complications indicates genuine difficulty in mastering the technique. With the use for virtual reality simulation, laser delivery and application can be practiced without subjecting patients to possible hazards. [9],[10]

The outcomes from our study indicated that training with the PixEye simulator significantly enhanced the capability of medical student to perform laser trabeculoplasty. This is an encouraging outcome as our cohort represented medical students who would be relatively unfamiliar with the procedure compared to residents in ophthalmology. For example, ophthalmology residents may be inherently more proficient at the laser procedure due to past experience and/or greater familiarity with the eye. Future studies should compare the performance of residents in ophthalmology and to medical students to determine if the learning curve is faster after VR training and the differences in performance between groups.

Previous studies of virtual reality training for retinal photocoagulation, [10],[11],[12] reported comparable results. However to our knowledge, there are no previous studies of with argon laser trabeculoplasty after virtual reality training.

Training with the PixEye simulator may make medical study more proficient at performing laser trabeculoplasty and limit possible errors in laser application thereby limiting complication.

 
   References Top

1.Wise JB. Long term control of adult open-angle glaucoma by argon laser treatment. Ophthalmology 1981;88:197-202.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Wise JB, Witter SL. Argon laser therapy for open angle glaucoma: A pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol 1979;97:319-24.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Thomas JV, Simmons RJ, Belcher CD. Argon laser trabeculoplasty in the pre-surgical glaucoma patient. Ophthalmology 1982;89:187-94.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Schwartz LW, Speath GL, Traverso C, Greenidge KC. Variation of technique on the results of argon laser trabeculoplasty. Ophthalmology 1983;90:781-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Wilensky JT, Jampol LM. Laser therapy for open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1981;88:213-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Ticho U, Nesher R. Laser trabeculoplasty in glaucoma: Ten year evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 1983;101:895-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Glaucoma Laser Trial Research Group. The Glaucoma Laser Trial 2: Results of argon laser trabeculoplasty versus topical medicines. Ophthalmology 1990;97:1403-10.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Rouland JF, Dubois P, Chaillou C, Meseuree P, Karpf S, Godin S, et al. Ophthalmologic simulator of laser photocoagulation: Contribution to virtual reality. J Fr Ophtalmol 1995;18:536-41.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Khalifa YM, Bogorad D, Gibson V, Peifer J, Nussbaum J. Virtual reality in ophthalmology training. Surv Ophthalmol 2006;51:259-73.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
10.Rossi JV, Verma D, Fujii GY, Lakhanpal RR, Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr. Virtual vitroretinal surgical simulator as a training tool. Retina 2004;24:231-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
11.Peugnet F, Dubois P, Rouland JF. Virtual reality versus conventional training in retinal photocoagulation: A first clinical assessment. Comput Aided Surg 1998;3:20-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.Dubois P, Rouland JF, Meseure P, Karpf S, Chaillou C. Simulator for laser photocoagulation in ophthalmology. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1995;42:688-93.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Who really needs a Metaverse in anatomy education? A review with preliminary survey results
Joe Iwanaga, Edward C. Muo, Yoko Tabira, Koichi Watanabe, Susan J. Tubbs, Anthony V. D'Antoni, Mathangi Rajaram-Gilkes, Marios Loukas, Mohammed K. Khalil, R. Shane Tubbs
Clinical Anatomy. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Metaverse and Virtual Health Care in Ophthalmology: Opportunities and Challenges
Ting Fang Tan, Yong Li, Jane Sujuan Lim, Dinesh Visva Gunasekeran, Zhen Ling Teo, Wei Yan Ng, Daniel SW. Ting
Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology. 2022; 11(3): 237
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Game Technologies in Ophthalmology Training
Eduardo Gross Muñoz, Ramon Fabregat, Jorge Bacca-Acosta, Néstor Duque-Méndez, Cecilia Avila-Garzon
Information. 2022; 13(5): 222
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Into the RetinaVerse: A New Frontier of Retina in the Metaverse
Joshua Ong, Seenu M. Hariprasad, Jay Chhablani
Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina. 2022; 53(11): 595
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Metaverse in Ophthalmology: The Convergence of Virtual and Physical Space in Eye Care
David Benet, Oscar J. Pellicer-Valero
Digital Medicine and Health Technology. 2022; 2022: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Applications of Extended Reality in Ophthalmology: Systematic Review
Chee Wui Ong, Marcus Chun Jin Tan, Michael Lam, Victor Teck Chang Koh
Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021; 23(8): e24152
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Virtual Reality in Medical Students’ Education: A Scoping Review (Preprint)
Haowen Jiang, Sunitha Vimalesvaran, Jeremy King Wang, Kee Boon Lim, Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali, Lorainne Tudor Car
JMIR Medical Education. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Update on Simulation-Based Surgical Training and Assessment in Ophthalmology
Ann Sofia S. Thomsen,Yousif Subhi,Jens Folke Kiilgaard,Morten la Cour,Lars Konge
Ophthalmology. 2015; 122(6): 1111
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Global collaboration and team-building through 3D virtual environments
Rachel Umoren,Dora J. Stadler,Stephen L. Gasior,Deema Al-Sheikhly,Barbara Truman,Carolyn Lowe
Innovations in Global Medical and Health Education. 2014; 2014(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4268    
    Printed388    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded179    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 9    

Recommend this journal