About MEAJO | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions to authors | Online submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology
Users Online: 801   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
  Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 72-76  

Corneal topography patterns in the Tehran eye study: Warning about the high prevalence of patterns with a skewed radial axis


1 Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital; Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran
2 Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Date of Web Publication1-Jan-2014

Correspondence Address:
Akbar Fotouhi
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-9233.124107

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the distribution of corneal topography patterns in Tehran.
Materials and Methods: In this population-based study, a total of 442 individuals were randomly selected by cluster sampling for complete ophthalmologic examination. A total of 404 (788 eyes) met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in this study. Orbscan II (Bausch and Lomb Surgical, Salt Lake City, USA) was used to determine the anterior segment indices and axial power maps for each eye.
Results: On the basis of the axial power maps, the symmetric bowtie (SB) (29.0%) and asymmetric bowtie with inferior steepening (16.7%) patterns were the most prevalent and the irregular (3.3%) and superior steepening (1.5%) patterns the least prevalent. Asymmetric bowtie pattern with a skewed radial axis (AB-SRAX) was seen in 7.6% of eyes. These cases had both thinner and steeper corneas compared with round and SB ones (P < 0.014 and P < 0.006). Maximum anterior elevation in 5 mm zone, of AB-SRAX corneas were higher than other patterns (P < 0.01) except for superior steepened and inferior steepened ones.
Conclusions: The distribution of corneal topographic patterns in Iranians seems like other Asian population on the whole. The 7.6% prevalence of AB-SRAX patterns may be a warning on keratoconus prevalence in our population. This is in line with recent regional reports.

Keywords: Corneal Topography Pattern, Cross-sectional Study, Orbscan II, Tehran


How to cite this article:
Hashemi H, Beiranvand A, Khabazkhoob M, Fotouhi A. Corneal topography patterns in the Tehran eye study: Warning about the high prevalence of patterns with a skewed radial axis. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2014;21:72-6

How to cite this URL:
Hashemi H, Beiranvand A, Khabazkhoob M, Fotouhi A. Corneal topography patterns in the Tehran eye study: Warning about the high prevalence of patterns with a skewed radial axis. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Jun 19];21:72-6. Available from: http://www.meajo.org/text.asp?2014/21/1/72/124107


   Introduction Top


Early investigations into the distribution of corneal topography patterns in different populations [1],[2],[3],[4] were conducted on healthy individuals to identify the variability of existing corneal patterns. Corneal topography and especially elevation based techniques (i.e. Slit-beam Scanning in Orbscan, Scheimpflug Camera in Pentacam) have been increasingly used for deciding on refractive correction methods [5] and diagnosis of some corneal disorders like keratoconus. Keratoconus is one of the ecstatic disorders, which accompanies with progressive protrusion and thinning of the cornea and irregular astigmatism. Although keratoconus is a challenging subject for ophthalmology clinicians yet, its epidemiologic aspects (i.e., prevalence, etiology) are either attractive. Middle-east countries have been zoomed in recently by keratoconus prevalence studies. [6],[7],[8],[9] Considering the importance of corneal topography in keratoconus detection, population-based data from this region could be judged as noticeable evidence in this context. The most common classification of corneal topographic maps is that provided by Rabinowitz et al. [1] Among these patterns, skewed radial axis (SRAX) patterns have showed association with keratoconus. [10],[11] In this study, we determine the distribution of topographic patterns of studied people to see whether there is a background for hypothesized prevalence.


   Materials and Methods Top


The Tehran eye study was a cross-sectional study performed in 2002 and the detailed methodology of the study was reported previously. [12] Briefly, random stratified cluster sampling was performed based on populations in different regions of Tehran. In total, 160 clusters were identified, each of which contained 10 households. After randomly determining the first household in each cluster, others were selected in a clockwise direction. All members of the family were familiarized with the objectives of the study and those who were willing to participate were invited to the Noor Eye Clinic for ophthalmologic examination. Of these, 442 individuals from districts [1],[2],[3],[4] in Tehran underwent corneal topography. Exclusion criteria were: History of refractive surgery, cataracts, glaucoma, use of contact lenses, use of ophthalmological drops, Axial maps with no clear central 6 mm zone of cornea and trauma cases. No limits for age or keratometric changes were applied. Axial power maps that did not include the complete central 6 mm of the cornea and cases with clear artefacts were excluded.

Corneal topography

Corneal topography was performed by slit-beam scanning topography with Orbscan II (Bausch and Lomb Surgical, Salt Lake City, USA). This method uses a video-assisted slit lamp diagnostic system and was introduced in the late 1990s. In this study, version 3 of the software included with the instrument was used for modeling. Blinking was not prevented except for immediately before imaging. Imaging was performed using color coded maps based on standard relative style. Steps of 0.5 Diopter (D) were used for the axial power maps. Each color was ± 0.25 D higher and lower than its determined value. Green was used to determine the median axial power. The location, examiner and device were the same for all examinations in order to control for their biases as much as possible. Classification of corneal topography patterns was performed by [3] expert ophthalmologists on the basis of the 10 patterns [Figure 1] described by Rabinowitz et al. [1] Elevation data were calculated based on best fit sphere on 8 mm diameter.
Figure 1: Classification of corneal topography patterns based on the study by Rabinowitz et al. (a) Round, (b) Oval, (c) Superior Steepening, (d) Inferior steepening, (e) Irregular, (f) Symmetric bowtie with skewed radial axis, (g) Asymmetric bowtie with inferior steepening, (h) Asymmetric bowtie with superior steepening, (i) Asymmetric bowtie with skewed radial axis (j) Symmetric bowtie

Click here to view


In statistical calculations, generalized estimating equations method was applied to control the relationship between right and left eyes. Then means of studied indices were compared among groups. P < 0.05 was considered as significant in analyses.

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the National Research Center. The participants were informed of the research methodology using comprehensible local language and their verbal consent to participation was obtained.


   Results Top


A total of 6497 individuals were invited to participate in the Tehran Eye Study, 4562 of whom responded (response rate = 70.3%). Of these respondents, 442 (aged >14 years and living in districts 1-4) were selected for corneal imaging. After applying the exclusion criteria, 410 healthy individuals were eligible for corneal topography. Lack of fixation on the central topography target and regular keratometric rings caused 22 individuals to only undergo corneal scanning of one eye. Eleven scans were excluded because of artefacts. Thus, 404 individuals (788 eyes) were studied. Among all participants, 231 (60.8%) were female. Mean age of the participants was 40.9 ± 16.9 years. [Table 1] shows more details of the evaluated indices.
Table 1: Mean values of anterior segment indices by corneal topography patterns and age groups

Click here to view


Distribution of corneal topography patterns

As can be seen in [Figure 2], the symmetric bowtie (SB) (29.0%) and asymmetric bowtie with inferior steepening (IS) (16.7%) patterns were the most common, followed by the round (16.0%), asymmetric bowtie with superior steepening (SS) (10.0%), asymmetric bowtie with SRAX (AB-SRAX) (7.6%), oval (6.6%), IS (4.7%), SB with SRAX (SB-SRAX) (4.7%), irregular (3.3%) and SS (1.4%) patterns. A total of 68.0% of patterns were classified as bowtie and 32.0% as non-bowtie.
Figure 2: Distribution of corneal topography patterns in women and men in the Tehran Eye Study

Click here to view


The mean age of individuals in the different corneal topography groups was found to be significantly different (P < 0.001). As can be seen in [Table 1], the lowest mean age was associated with the SB pattern (35.48 ± 16.19 years) and the highest mean age with the irregular pattern (49.88 ± 18.25 years). The most frequent patterns observed in individuals >50 years were round (41.9%), oval (46.3%) and irregular (57.7%). In general, individuals with a non-bowtie pattern (44.6 ± 16.9) were older than those with a bowtie pattern (39.1 ± 16.6) (P < 0.001). Participants aged ≥30 years had higher mean corneal power (P = 0.036) [Table 1].

Studying the effect of sex on the distribution of patterns revealed a borderline non-significant relationship (P = 0.087).

In comparison with round and SB patterns, corneas with an AB-SRAX pattern had either thinner cornea (P < 0.014) or steeper ones (P < 0.006). As can be seen in [Table 1], age categories made no difference in central corneal thickness (P = 0.186). Maximum anterior elevation in 5 mm zone (AE), of AB-SRAX corneas were higher than other patterns (P < 0.010) except for superior steepened and inferior steepened ones. According to age categories, no change was seen in AE (P = 0.116). Maximum posterior elevation in 5 mm zone (PE) showed no difference among different patterns (P = 0.336). Mean PE of people less than 30 years (25 μ) was lower than ones aged ≥ 30 years (29 μ) (P = 0.008).


   Discussion Top


In general, bowtie patterns (SB/AB) were clearly dominant in the studied population. The bowtie patterns with SRAX were observed among more than 12% of studied corneas. Compared with findings of Rabinowitz et al., [1] (2%), that is a noticeable prevalence for such rare patterns. Considering the association between SRAX patterns and keratoconus [10],[11] this preserve more notice.

A relationship between age and changes in corneal topography has been reported in a number of different studies. [13],[14] As stated in the results of this report, dominant patterns in older individuals were round, oval and irregular. Topuz et al. found a change from the vertical bowtie pattern in individuals younger than 30 to a round pattern in those older than 30. [13] Furthermore, in the present study, individuals with a SB pattern had the lowest mean age (35.5 ± 16.2 years) and older individuals had an irregular pattern (49.9 ± 18.2 years). Differences in the frequency distribution of corneal patterns can to some extent be attributed to age, which has been confirmed by Riley et al. [15] Age related changes in tear film quality could be addressed as a related factor in this context. The slight power change in the older group could be attributable to this.

The effect of sex on the distribution of corneal topography patterns has been the subject of several studies. Data from the present study showed a similar distribution of corneal topography patterns in men and women. Rabinowitz et al., [1] whose study conformed most closely to the objectives and pattern distributions of the present study, also reported similar distribution patterns in men and women. [1] However, Goto et al. reported differences in men and women as they focused on quantitative indices and astigmatism patterns separately (with-the-rule/against-the-rule). [14] It is possible that the age distribution of the studied individuals was an underlying cause of the differences observed between men and women.

An association between mean power and topography pattern has been indirectly stated in studies of the corneal topography patterns of individuals with keratoconus. [16],[17] Some of the studies on keratoconus cases [10],[11] have reported that the AB-SRAX pattern is most common in individuals with/suspected of having keratoconus. Our data by revealing higher mean corneal power in the AB-SRAX pattern confirm this. The difference in mean corneal power in individuals with this pattern compared with those with a round or SB pattern is clear.

Elevation data either show specific features for AB-SRAX patterns. Higher maximum elevations at both anterior and posterior surfaces than many other patterns could be interpreted as another evidence for their association with keratoconus. Respected values were between related findings of other studies on manifest keratoconus groups [18],[19] and keratoconus suspect groups. [20],[21] Especially in these studies, PE has been noticed in determining keratoconus and grading its progress. [22]

If all bowtie patterns be merged in one category, their dominant frequency against non-bowtie patterns would be apparent. As shown in [Table 2], the difference in bowtie/non-bowtie pattern ratio in Asian populations compared with European and American (White ethnicity) populations is clear. Although the findings of Modis et al. are geographically related to Europe, their distribution is different from that of common patterns observed in European populations. As a subtype of bowtie patterns, the frequency above than 12% of patterns with a SRAX in the studied population highlights the need to pay attention to such differences. Ethnic features could be addressed as a possible explanation. That is the point also mentioned by others who find higher prevalence of keratoconus among Asia/middle-east people. [6],[7]
Table 2: Comparison of the prevalence (%) of normal topography patterns in different studies

Click here to view



   Conclusion Top


The distribution of corneal topographic patterns in Iranians seems like other Asian societies on the whole. Patterns with SRAX, which were considered especially in this study, were observed among more than 12% of cases. This amount of SRAX patterns brings this to mind that maybe keratoconus prevalence is higher in our population. More profound regional studies are needed to ascertain the reliable prevalence rate of keratoconus and its etiologic background.[26]

 
   References Top

1.Rabinowitz YS, Yang H, Brickman Y, Akkina J, Riley C, Rotter JI, et al. Videokeratography database of normal human corneas. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:610-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Bogan SJ, Waring GO 3 rd , Ibrahim O, Drews C, Curtis L. Classification of normal corneal topography based on computer-assisted videokeratography. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:945-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Kanpolat A, Simºek T, Alp NM. The evaluation of normal corneal topography in emmetropic eyes with computer-assisted videokeratography. CLAO J 1997;23:168-71.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Kim SJ, Kim DM, Lee JH, Chang BL, Yun DH. Normal corneal topographic patterns of Korean adults. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 1996;37:15-21.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Read SA, Collins MJ, Iskander DR, Davis BA. Corneal topography with Scheimpflug imaging and videokeratography: Comparative study of normal eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:1072-81.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Millodot M, Shneor E, Albou S, Atlani E, Gordon-Shaag A. Prevalence and associated factors of keratoconus in Jerusalem: A cross-sectional study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2011;18:91-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Pearson AR, Soneji B, Sarvananthan N, Sandford-Smith JH. Does ethnic origin influence the incidence or severity of keratoconus? Eye (Lond) 2000;14 (Pt 4):625-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Assiri AA, Yousuf BI, Quantock AJ, Murphy PJ. Incidence and severity of keratoconus in Asir province, Saudi Arabia. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1403-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Waked N, Fayad AM, Fadlallah A, El Rami H. Keratoconus screening in a Lebanese students' population. J Fr Ophtalmol 2012;35:23-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Levy D, Hutchings H, Rouland JF, Guell J, Burillon C, Arné JL, et al. Videokeratographic anomalies in familial keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2004;111:867-74.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Li X, Rabinowitz YS, Rasheed K, Yang H. Longitudinal study of the normal eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients. Ophthalmology 2004;111:440-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Mohammad K. The Tehran eye study: Research design and eye examination protocol. BMC Ophthalmol 2003;3:8.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.Topuz H, Ozdemir M, Cinal A, Gumusalan Y. Age-related differences in normal corneal topography. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2004;35:298-303.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.Goto T, Klyce SD, Zheng X, Maeda N, Kuroda T, Ide C. Gender-and age-related differences in corneal topography. Cornea 2001;20:270-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.Riley AF, Grupcheva CN, Malik TY, Craig JP, McGhee CN. The Auckland cataract study: Demographic, corneal topographic and ocular biometric parameters. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2001;29:381-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.Holladay JT. Keratoconus detection using corneal topography. J Refract Surg 2009;25:S958-62.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.Liu Z, Zhang M, Chen J, Luo L, Chen L, Gong X, et al. Corneal topography and thickness in keratoconus. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2002;38:740-3.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.Fam HB, Lim KL. Corneal elevation indices in normal and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:1281-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.Lim L, Wei RH, Chan WK, Tan DT. Evaluation of keratoconus in Asians: Role of Orbscan II and Tomey TMS-2 corneal topography. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:390-400.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.Schlegel Z, Hoang-Xuan T, Gatinel D. Comparison of and correlation between anterior and posterior corneal elevation maps in normal eyes and keratoconus-suspect eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:789-95.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.Rao SN, Raviv T, Majmudar PA, Epstein RJ. Role of Orbscan II in screening keratoconus suspects before refractive corneal surgery. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1642-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]    
22.Ishii R, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shimizu K, Utsumi Y, Kumanomido T. Correlation of corneal elevation with severity of keratoconus by means of anterior and posterior topographic analysis. Cornea 2012;31:253-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]    
23.Liu Z, Huang AJ, Pflugfelder SC. Evaluation of corneal thickness and topography in normal eyes using the Orbscan corneal topography system. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:774-8.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]    
24.Kim HC, Chang SD. Relationship between topographic patterns and corneal astigmatism in Korean adults. Korean J Ophthalmol 2003;17:91-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]    
25.Tananuvat N, Pansatiankul N. Assessment of the anterior structures of eyes in a normal Northern Thai group using the Orbscan II. J Med Assoc Thai 2005;88 Suppl 9:S105-13.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.Módis L Jr, Langenbucher A, Seitz B. Evaluation of normal corneas using the scanning-slit topography/pachymetry system. Cornea 2004;23:689-94.  Back to cited text no. 26
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3623    
    Printed49    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded170    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal