|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 175-181
The prevalence of astigmatism and its determinants in a rural population of Iran: The "Nooravaran Salamat" mobile eye clinic experience
Hassan Hashemi1, Farhad Rezvan1, Abbas Ali Yekta2, Maryam Hashemi3, Reza Norouzirad4, Mehdi Khabazkhoob5
1 Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Optometry, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3 Department of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Medicine, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran
5 Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
|Date of Web Publication||1-Apr-2014|
Department of Epidemiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Source of Support: Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Purpose: The prevalence of astigmatism, and the astigmatic axis, and their determinants were evaluated in a rural population of Iran.
Materials and Methods: In a cross-sectional study conducted from May to August 2011, 13 villages in the vicinity of the city of Khaf in northeast Iran were investigated in this study. All the examinations including visual acuity, refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy and fundoscopy were performed in a Mobile Eye Clinic. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Only phakic eye that could be reliably refracted without a previous history of ocular surgery were included.
Results: Out of 2635 participants who were screened, 2124 were analysed for this study of whom 52% were female. The prevalence of astigmatism was 32.2% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 30.2-34.2). Astigmatism significantly increased from 14.3% in the under 15-year-old age group to 67.2% in the age group of over 65-years old (P < 0.001). The prevalence of With-The-Rule (WTR), Against-The-Rule (ATR), and oblique astigmatism was 11.7%, 18.1%, and 2.4 %, respectively. ATR significantly increased with age (P < 0.001). The mean corneal astigmatism was 0.73 D which linearly increased with age (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Attention must be paid to astigmatism in rural areas due to the high prevalence. Further studies are suggested to discover the role of the environmental and genetic factors. It seems that environmental and occupational factors in the villages cause a significant increase in the prevalence of astigmatism with age. A high percentage of participants had ATR astigmatism, which was more common at older ages.
Keywords: Astigmatism, Iran, Prevalence, Rural
|How to cite this article:|
Hashemi H, Rezvan F, Yekta AA, Hashemi M, Norouzirad R, Khabazkhoob M. The prevalence of astigmatism and its determinants in a rural population of Iran: The "Nooravaran Salamat" mobile eye clinic experience. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2014;21:175-81
|How to cite this URL:|
Hashemi H, Rezvan F, Yekta AA, Hashemi M, Norouzirad R, Khabazkhoob M. The prevalence of astigmatism and its determinants in a rural population of Iran: The "Nooravaran Salamat" mobile eye clinic experience. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Jan 21];21:175-81. Available from: http://www.meajo.org/text.asp?2014/21/2/175/129772
| Introduction|| |
Astigmatism is a refractive error. The prevalence of astigmatism, myopia, and hyperopia, has been reported in numerous studies worldwide. ,,,, Similar to myopia, astigmatism is influenced by genetic and ethnic actors and its prevalence has been reported from 30% among old people in Myanmar to 77% in Indonesia. ,,, Astigmatism is the most common refractive error in certain countries such as Indonesia,  Taiwan,  and Japan,  and approximately half of the people in these areas suffer from astigmatism. Age, gender, genetics, and even environmental factors have been shown to affect astigmatism in different studies. ,,,,,,,,,,,, Astigmatism has some major differences compared to myopia and hyperopia. The prevalence of myopia and hyperopia is presented in amount and percentage, however, there are different types of astigmatism mainly related to cornea. Therefore, the prevalence of the different types of astigmatism need to be reported. Furthermore, the astigmatic axis is an important indicator of this refractive error which in some cases, is more important than the magnitude of astigmatic power. ,
Few studies have focused solely on the details of astigmatism. , Although the prevalence of astigmatism has been reported in many studies, fewer studies have investigated the astigmatism axis and corneal astigmatism in addition to the prevalence of astigmatism in a normal population. ,,,
In Iran, some studies have reported the prevalence of astigmatism along with myopia and hyperopia. ,,,, Only two studies have reported the prevalence of astigmatism without myopia and hyperopia in Tehran and Shahroud. , Previous studies , have reported a relatively high prevalence of astigmatism in Iran. Hence, greater details of astigmatism in an Iranian population can provide valuable information about this refractive error. Furthermore, previous studies have been mostly done in Iranian cities and no reports are available on astigmatism in rural areas of Iran. Therefore, this study investigates the total and corneal astigmatism in a normal rural population of Iran.
| Materials and Methods|| |
In this cross-sectional study, participants were selected from rural areas of Khaf, Iran, from May to August 2011. The details of the methodology of this study have been previously published. 
Briefly, Khaf is located in the north-eastern Iran and has 83 villages. Thirteen villages were selected for this study and all of their residents were investigated. After selecting the villages and based on a predefined schedule, the residents of each village were transported to the central village to be visited by ophthalmologists and optometrists.
Examinations were performed in the Mobile Eye Clinic (Nooravaran salamat), which was equipped with ophthalmic equipment. After making the required arrangements with local authorities, the participants were interviewed and ophthalmic examinations were performed on a previously announced day.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria were the person's consent to participate in the study and being the resident one of the selected villages. Only data from phakic eyes were included for analysis. Individuals with a history of eye surgery, and the persons whose refraction and keratometry were not measured or were measured erroneously were excluded from the study.
The site for optometric examinations had standard illumination. The first step was auto-refraction and k-reading with the Topcon RM8800 (Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) for each individual. To verify the accuracy of auto-refraction, refraction (HEINE BETA 200 retinoscope; HEINE Optotechnic, Herrsching, Germany) with trial lenses (MSD, Italy) was performed. The right eye of each subject was tested first followed by the left eye. All study participants underwent a non-cycloplegic refraction. Visual acuity was measured at a distance of 4.5 m with a NIDEK LCD (NIDEK Co. Ltd., Gamagori, Japan). If uncorrected visual acuity of the individual was less than 20/20, subjective refraction was performed.
These examinations were performed by two ophthalmologists after optometric examinations. All subjects were underwent an examination including direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy, slit-lamp biomicroscopy (Slit Lamp; Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland), measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP), and assessment of lens opacities. In this study, two ophthalmologists collaborated with us who were trained for the examination procedures specific to this study.
Astigmatism was defined as the cylinder power of more than 0.5 D. For investigating the severity of astigmatism, its prevalence was reported based on the cylinder power greater than 1, 2 and 3 D. To analyze the axis of astigmatism, those with astigmatism >0.5 D were included. The astigmatism axis was classified as With-The-Rule (WTR) if the axis was between 150° and 180° or between 0° and 30°, against-the-rule (ATR) if the axis was between 60° and 120° and oblique (OBL) if was at any other meridian. Keratomety results were used to determine corneal astigmatism. This index was the difference between maximum and minimum keratometry.
The prevalence of total and corneal astigmatism was reported as percentage with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A multiple logistic regression model was used for investigating the relationship of astigmatism with age, gender and cataract. In this model, astigmatism with cylinder power worse than 0.5 D was defined as the dependent variable. Multiple logistic regression was performed to investigate all variables. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
A written informed consent was obtained from each participant. If the participant was under the legal age, consent was obtained from his/her guardian. The protocol of this study was approved by the review board of Noor Ophthalmology Research Center.
| Results|| |
Of 3,475 selected individuals 2,635 participated in the study (response rate 75.8%). After implementing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data of 2124 participants were analyzed of whom 52% were female. The mean (± standard deviation) age of the participants was 32.1(±19.5)-years old (range, 1-90 years).
The prevalence of astigmatism with cylinder power greater than 0.5 D was 32.2% (95% CI: 30.2-34.2). The prevalence of astigmatism was 33.3% and 31.1% in females and males, respectively. Logistic regression did not reveal any significant relationship between the gender and the prevalence of astigmatism (P = 0.273). The prevalence of astigmatism increased linearly with age [Table 1]. The prevalence of astigmatism was 14.3% in the participants younger than 15 years of age and showed a significant increase up to 67.2% in the participants over 65-years old; therefore, each 1-year increase in age increased the likelihood of astigmatism by 1.04 times (P < 0.001). According to the results of this study, the prevalence of astigmatism with cylinder power more than 1, 2 and 3 D was 15.6% (95% CI: 14.0-17.1), 4.2% (95% CI: 3.3-5.0), and 1.5% (95% CI: 1.3-2.1), respectively. As shown in [Table 2], the prevalence of astigmatism with the cylinder power greater than 0.5 D was 14.1% in the participants aged 5-15 years and 53.3% in the participants who were 40 years of age or older.
|Table 1: Prevalence of astigmatism based on cylinder powers of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 dioptre according to age and gender|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Minimum, maximum and mean keratometry-readings and corneal astigmatism in different studies|
Click here to view
[Figure 1] shows the severity of astigmatism in males and females (P = 0.278, Chi-square test).
The prevalence of WTR, ATR, and oblique astigmatism was 11.7% (95% CI: 10.4-13.1), 18.1% (95% CI: 16.5-19.8), and 2.4% (95% CI: 1.7-3.0), respectively. As shown in [Figure 2], the prevalence of different types of astigmatism showed significant changes with age. The greatest variation of astigmatism with age was seen in ATR. This type of astigmatism increased from 5.9% in participants under the age of 15 years to 48.2% in participants over 65 years of age (P < 0.001). The prevalence of WTR, ATR, and oblique astigmatism was 10.8%, 18% and 2.3% in males and 12.5%, 18.3% and 2.5% in females. There was no significant difference in astigmatism between males and females (P = 0.612, Chi-square test).
|Figure 2: The prevalence of the different types of total astigmatism in different age groups|
Click here to view
[Table 2] presents the minimum, maximum and average k-readings. The mean k was 43.44 D (95% CI: 43.35-43.53) in all participants, 42.99 D (95% CI: 42.87-43.12) in males, and 43.86 D (95% CI: 43.74-43.98) in females. The mean k was significantly higher in females than males (P < 0.001). No significant difference in mean k was found among different age groups (P = 0.558). Based on the results of this study, the mean k was greater than 47 D in 1.3% of the participants. The mean corneal astigmatism was 0.73 D (95% CI: 0.69-0.77) with no significant difference between males and females (P = 0.570). Corneal astigmatism showed a significant linear increase, from 0.51 D in individuals aged below 15 years to 1.68 D in the participants above 65 years of age, with age (P < 0.001) [Table 2]. [Figure 3] shows the prevalence of different types of corneal astigmatism in the participants with corneal astigmatism more than 0.5 D. According to this figure, WTR astigmatism decreased and ATR astigmatism increased with age (P < 0.001).
| Discussion|| |
To our knowledge, this the first published study that investigated the prevalence of astigmatism in a rural Iranian population. Additionally, few studies worldwide have focused on the prevalence of astigmatism in an extended age group similar to our study. The prevalence of astigmatism with the cylinder power greater than 0.5 D was 32.2%. There was considerable variation in the different age groups and the lowest and highest prevalence of astigmatism was observed among the participants below 15 years of age and over 65 years of age, respectively. We have attempted to compare these results with those of other studies with similar equal age groups; however, there are very few studies on all the age groups.
The prevalence of astigmatism in the participants who were 5-15 years old was 14.1%. This age group is the most frequently investigated group in most studies. The results of other studies are summarized in [Table 3]. The lowest and highest prevalence of astigmatism were reported in Nepal  (3.5%) and China  (42.7%), respectively, using the same definition. According to the studies conducted in Iran, the prevalence of astigmatism varies from 11.3% in Shiraz  to 18.7% in Dezful.  Comparison of these results with the results of other studies conducted in Iran reveals that the mean prevalence of astigmatism in children aged 5-15 years who live in rural areas of Khaf was mid-range. Nonetheless, in comparison with the studies conducted in other parts of the world such as China and other East Asian countries [Table 3], the prevalence of astigmatism in children in this study was not high. Based on the previous studies, it has been proven that genetic and even ethnic factors affect astigmatism.  Therefore, the difference between the findings of the present study and other studies performed in this age group in Iran can be justified by ethnic and genetic differences. Nevertheless, our findings for the participants over 40 years of age were significant. In contrast to children, the prevalence of astigmatism was high among middle-aged and elderly participants. The prevalence of astigmatism among the participants over 40 years of age was 53.5% and increased up to 67% in the participants over 65-years old. This finding was not expectable when compared with other studies conducted in similar age groups. According to [Figure 4], the prevalence of astigmatism with the same definition as our study varied from 30.6% in people over 40-years old in Myanmar  to 77% in people over 50-years old in Indonesia.  The prevalence of astigmatism in this study was even higher as compared to other studies in Iran; the prevalence of astigmatism was reported to be 49.1% and 37.5% in the middle-age and elderly residents of Shahroud  and Mashhad  , respectively. Since the prevalence of astigmatism was low in children, the high prevalence of astigmatism in the middle-aged participants can be affected by factors other than ethnicity and genetics. Considering the fact that most of the participants in this study were farmers and ranchers, and environmental conditions such as dirt, dust, and sun cause more eye rubbing and also more squinting due to more sunlight, it seems that these factors have considerable effects on the prevalence of astigmatism in this rural age group. In this study, the prevalence of astigmatism did not show a significant difference between genders in different age groups. However, contradictory results have been reported in the literature. ,,, For example, Sawada et al.,  in Japan, Wong et al.,  among the Chinese living in Singapore, Krishnaiah et al.,  in India, Gupta et al.,  in Myanmar, Cheng et al.,  in Taiwan and Saw et al.,  in Singapore did not find any differences in the prevalence of astigmatism between males and females. Also, some reports from Beijing  and Bangladesh  have shown the prevalence of astigmatism was higher among females than males. However, Nanjia et al.,  in India and Saw et al.,  in Indonesia reported the prevalence of astigmatism was higher in males when compared to females.
|Figure 4: The prevalence of astigmatism with cylinder power more than 0.5 D in individuals over 40-years old in different studies|
Click here to view
|Table 3: The prevalence of astigmatism in children in different studies worldwide|
Click here to view
The prevalence of astigmatism increased considerably with age, which concurs with previous studies. , Some prospective studies , have reported that the cylinder power significantly increases with age over time. In the present study, most of the changes in astigmatism can be justified by environmental factors in the elderly and the greater exposure to these conditions as compared to children. However, corneal changes with age is another explanation for the increase in the prevalence of astigmatism the elderly, which has been confirmed by Asgari  and Asano. 
The current study found that ATR astigmatism was the most frequent among the participants and that the prevalence of this type of astigmatism significantly increased with age. Previous studies have also shown that ATR astigmatism increases with age. ,,,
Variations of astigmatism with age show that immediately after birth, newborns have ATR astigmatism which shifts toward WTR astigmatism at the beginning of childhood up to almost 20 years old. Then, it remains almost unchanged up to the 4 th decade of life and subsequently changes towards ATR.  The decrease in the eyelid pressure due to weakness of the eye muscles is one of the most important factors that change the type of astigmatism with age. This finding has been confirmed in previous studies. 
In the current study, the mean keratometry was 43.44 D, which concurs with results from previous studies. ,, Since the power of the cornea has been measured by different devices in different studies, comparison of the results is tenuous at best. However, the results were not considerably different for keratometry between the current study and previous studies. The mean corneal astigmatism was 0.73 D in this study, which was a little lower than the findings of other similar studies. ,
Nevertheless, in age groups, the mean corneal astigmatism considerably increased in such a way that the difference in corneal astigmatism between participants under 15 and over 65-years old was 1 D. This finding supported the previous hypothesis concerning the effect of environmental factors on the cornea.  This finding was also in agreement with the findings of Asano et al.,  and Asgari,  who reported that changes in astigmatism at an older age are mostly due to corneal changes.
The axis of corneal astigmatism was similar to total astigmatism. In this type of astigmatism, the increase in ATR astigmatism and decrease in WTR astigmatism with age were even more significant than total astigmatism. This finding shows that major changes in the axis of refractive astigmatism follow the axis of corneal astigmatism. This finding confirms that with age, the effect of eyelid pressure on the cornea decreases.
The limitations of this study were sampling in a certain rural area of Iran, which limits generalizing the results to all Iranian villages, and the high non-response rate which may be accompanied by selection bias.
| Conclusions|| |
Attention must be paid to astigmatism in villages due to the high prevalence. Further studies to explore the roles of genetics and environment are suggested. It seems that environmental and occupational factors in the villages cause a significant increase in the prevalence of astigmatism with age. A high percentage of participants had ATR astigmatism, which was more common at older ages. Corneal astigmatism was rather similar to total astigmatism in all age groups.
| References|| |
|1.||Yekta A, Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Dehghani C, Ostadimoghaddam H, Heravian J, et al. Prevalence of refractive errors among schoolchildren in Shiraz, Iran. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2010;38:242-8. |
|2.||Yekta AA, Fotouhi A, Khabazkhoob M, Hashemi H, Ostadimoghaddam H, Heravian J, et al. The prevalence of refractive errors and its determinants in the elderly population of Mashhad, Iran. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2009;16:198-203. |
|3.||Xu L, Li J, Cui T, Hu A, Fan G, Zhang R, et al. Refractive error in urban and rural adult Chinese in Beijing. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1676-83. |
|4.||Saw SM, Chan YH, Wong WL, Shankar A, Sandar M, Aung T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in the Singapore Malay Eye Survey. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1713-9. |
|5.||Rezvan F, Khabazkhoob M, Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Ostadimoghaddam H, Heravian J, et al. Prevalence of refractive errors among school children in Northeastern Iran. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012;32:25-30. |
|6.||Saw SM, Gazzard G, Koh D, Farook M, Widjaja D, Lee J, et al. Prevalence rates of refractive errors in Sumatra, Indonesia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:3174-80. |
|7.||Liang YB, Wong TY, Sun LP, Tao QS, Wang JJ, Yang XH, et al. Refractive errors in a rural Chinese adult population the Handan eye study. Ophthalmology 2009;116:2119-27. |
|8.||Cheng CY, Hsu WM, Liu JH, Tsai SY, Chou P. Refractive errors in an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: The Shihpai Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:4630-8. |
|9.||Sawada A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Iwase A, Yamamoto T. Refractive errors in an elderly Japanese population: The Tajimi study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:363-70. |
|10.||Ostadimoghaddam H, Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Yekta A, Heravian J, Rezvan F, et al. Prevalence of the refractive errors by age and gender in Mashhad, Iran: The Mashhad eye study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2011;39:743-51. |
|11.||Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Yekta A, Jafarzadehpur E, Emamian MH, Shariati M, et al. High prevalence of astigmatism in the forty to sixty-four year old population of Shahroud, Iran. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2012;40:247-54. |
|12.||Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Yekta AA, Mohammad K, Khoob MK. Characteristics of astigmatism in a population of schoolchildren, Dezful, Iran. Optom Vis Sci 2011;88:1054-9. |
|13.||Schellini SA, Durkin SR, Hoyama E, Hirai F, Cordeiro R, Casson RJ, et al. Prevalence of refractive errors in a Brazilian population: The Botucatu eye study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2009;16:90-7. |
|14.||Li Z, Sun D, Cuj H, Zhang L, Lju P, Yang H, et al. Refractive error among the elderly in rural Southern Harbin, China. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2009;16:388-94. |
|15.||Gupta A, Casson RJ, Newland HS, Muecke J, Landers J, Selva D, et al. Prevalence of refractive error in rural Myanmar: The Meiktila Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:26-32. |
|16.||Hashemi H, Hatef E, Fotouhi A, Mohammad K. Astigmatism and its determinants in the Tehran population: The Tehran eye study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2005;12:373-81. |
|17.||Fan DS, Rao SK, Cheung EY, Islam M, Chew S, Lam DS. Astigmatism in Chinese preschool children: Prevalence, change, and effect on refractive development. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:938-41. |
|18.||Read SA, Collins MJ, Carney LG. A review of astigmatism and its possible genesis. Clin Exp Optom 2007;90:5-19. |
|19.||Mandel Y, Stone RA, Zadok D. Parameters associated with the different astigmatism axis orientations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:723-30. |
|20.||Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Tung YL, Lin LL, Chen CJ, Hung PT. The prevalence of astigmatism in Taiwan schoolchildren. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:94-8. |
|21.||Huynh SC, Kifley A, Rose KA, Morgan I, Heller GZ, Mitchell P. Astigmatism and its components in 6-year-old children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:55-64. |
|22.||Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Mohammad K. The age- and gender-specific prevalences of refractive errors in Tehran: The Tehran Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2004;11:213-25. |
|23.||Hashemi H, Rezvan F, Ostadimoghaddam H, Abdollahi M, Hashemi M, Khabazkhoob M. High prevalence of refractive errors in a rural population: "Nooravaran Salamat" Mobile Eye Clinic experience. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2013;41:635-43. |
|24.||Pokharel GP, Negrel AD, Munoz SR, Ellwein LB. Refractive Error Study in Children: Results from Mechi Zone, Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:436-44. |
|25.||He M, Zeng J, Liu Y, Xu J, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB. Refractive error and visual impairment in urban children in southern china. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:793-9. |
|26.||Wong TY, Foster PJ, Hee J, Ng TP, Tielsch JM, Chew SJ, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2486-94. |
|27.||Krishnaiah S, Srinivas M, Khanna RC, Rao GN. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in the South Indian adult population: The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Clin Ophthalmol 2009;3:17-27. |
|28.||Bourne RR, Dineen BP, Ali SM, Noorul Huq DM, Johnson GJ. Prevalence of refractive error in Bangladeshi adults: Results of the national blindness and low vision survey of bangladesh. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1150-60. |
|29.||Nangia V, Jonas JB, Sinha A, Matin A, Kulkarni M. Refractive error in central India: The central india eye and medical study. Ophthalmology 2010;117:693-9. |
|30.||Foran S, Mitchell P, Wang JJ. Five-year change in visual acuity and incidence of visual impairment: The blue mountains eye study. Ophthalmology 2003;110:41-50. |
|31.||Gudmundsdottir E, Arnarsson A, Jonasson F. Five-year refractive changes in an adult population: Reykjavik Eye study. Ophthalmology 2005;112:672-7. |
|32.||Asgari S, Hashemi H, Mehravaran S, Khabazkhoob M, Emamian MH, Jafarzadehpur E, et al. Corneal refractive power and eccentricity in the 40- to 64-year-old population of Shahroud, Iran. Cornea 2013;32:25-9. |
|33.||Asano K, Nomura H, Iwano M, Ando F, Niino N, Shimokata H, et al. Relationship between astigmatism and aging in middle-aged and elderly Japanese. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2005;49:127-33. |
|34.||Read SA, Collins MJ, Carney LG. The influence of eyelid morphology on normal corneal shape. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:112-9. |
|35.||Tananuvat N, Pansatiankul N. Assessment of the anterior structures of eyes in a normal Northern Thai group using the Orbscan II. J Med Assoc Thai 2005;88 Suppl 9:S105-13. |
|36.||KhabazKhoob M, Hashemi H, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, Yekta A, Fotouhi A. Keratometry measurements, corneal astigmatism and irregularity in a normal population: The Tehran Eye Study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2010;30:800-5. |
|37.||Fam HB, Lim KL. Validity of the keratometric index: Large population-based study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:686-91. |
|38.||Dandona R, Dandona L, Srinivas M, Sahare P, Narsaiah S, Munoz SR, et al. Refractive error in children in a rural population in India. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:615-22. |
|39.||Zhao J, Pan X, Sui R, Munoz SR, Sperduto RD, Ellwein LB. Refractive Error Study in Children: Results from Shunyi District, China. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:427-35. |
|40.||Naidoo KS, Raghunandan A, Mashige KP, Govender P, Holden BA, Pokharel GP, et al. Refractive error and visual impairment in African children in South Africa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:3764-70. |
|41.||Murthy GV, Gupta SK, Ellwein LB, Munoz SR, Pokharel GP, Sanga L, et al. Refractive error in children in an urban population in New Delhi. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:623-31. |
|42.||Goh PP, Abqariyah Y, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB. Refractive error and visual impairment in school-age children in Gombak District, Malaysia. Ophthalmology 2005;112:678-85. |
|43.||Maul E, Barroso S, Munoz SR, Sperduto RD, Ellwein LB. Refractive Error Study in Children: Results from La Florida, Chile. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:445-54. |
|44.||He MG, Lin Z, Huang J, Lu Y, Wu CF, Xu JJ. [Population-based survey of refractive error in school-aged children in Liwan District, Guangzhou]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2008;44:491-6. |
|45.||Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Mohammad K. The prevalence of refractive errors among schoolchildren in Dezful, Iran. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:287-92. |
[Table 1], [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Keratometry versus total corneal refractive power: Analysis of measurement repeatability with 5 different devices in normal eyes with low astigmatism
| ||Sylvia Fityo,Jens Bühren,Mehdi Shajari,Thomas Kohnen |
| ||Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2016; 42(4): 569 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Pattern of astigmatism in a clinical setting in Maldives
| ||Sanjay Marasini |
| ||Journal of Optometry. 2016; 9(1): 47 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Prevalence of Astigmatism in 4- to 6-Year-Old Population of Mashhad, Iran
| ||Hassan Hashemi,Soheila Asgari,Abbas Ali Yekta,Hadi Ostadimoghaddam,Batool Haghighi,Sara Soroush,Hava Shafiee,Mehdi Khabazkhoob |
| ||Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics. 2015; 6(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|