About MEAJO | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions to authors | Online submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology
Users Online: 867   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 205-209

Repeat selective laser trabeculoplasty can be effective in eyes with initial modest response


1 Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science - Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
2 Hudson Eye Physicians and Surgeons, Jersey City, New Jersey, USA

Correspondence Address:
Dr Albert S Khouri
Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology, Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 90 Bergen St., Suite 6100, Newark, NJ 07103, New Jersey
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-9233.134668

Rights and Permissions

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of repeat selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in eyes exhibiting only a modest response upon initial treatment. Materials and Methods: Retrospective chart review was conducted of 51 eyes that received initial 360 degree SLT (SLT1) and subsequent SLT (SLT2) from 2003-2011 at a large academic ophthalmology practice. Successful response (S) was a post-treatment 12 month mean IOP reduction ≥20% from baseline, while modest response (M) was <20% reduction over the same time. Chi-squared and log rank analyses were used to determine if success after SLT2 depended on having successful (S1) or modest (M1) response after SLT1. Results: IOP was significantly reduced from baseline in both SLT1 and SLT2. The proportion of eyes with S2 was not significantly different between those with initial M1 or S1 (36.67% vs. 52.38%, respectively; P = 0.26). Log rank analysis revealed no differences between M1 and S1 in determining SLT2 success (P = 0.41). This outcome was similar when the analyses were performed for the right and left eye independently. Conclusion: The proportion of eyes that successfully responded to repeat SLT did not differ based upon whether the response to initial SLT was successful or modest. This raises the possibility that repeat SLT should not be excluded as an option for those eyes that have only a modest initial response.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1770    
    Printed65    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded152    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal