About MEAJO | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions to authors | Online submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology
Users Online: 1239   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
  Table of Contents 
CASE REPORT
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 275-278  

Severe anisometropic myopia in identical twins


Department of Ophthalmology, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

Date of Web Publication19-Jun-2014

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Olukorede O. Adenuga
Department of Ophthalmology, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Plateau State - 930 001
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-9233.134695

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

High anisometropic myopia is a rare condition in twins. Genetic factors have been implicated in its development and there may be an association with vision-threatening complications. A pair of 11-year-old twins presented with poor distance vision in both eyes. Detailed ocular examination was performed including slit lamp examination, dilated funduscopy, cycloplegic refraction, keratometry and axial length measurement. The objective refraction was -6.50DS -2.00DC × 180 (right eye), -1.00DS (left eye) for the first twin; -13.75DS -2.25DC × 180 (right eye), -0.50DS -0.75DC × 04 (left eye) for the second twin. This case suggests an underlying genetic defect in the development of myopia.

Keywords: Anisometropia, Myopia, Twins


How to cite this article:
Adenuga OO. Severe anisometropic myopia in identical twins. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2014;21:275-8

How to cite this URL:
Adenuga OO. Severe anisometropic myopia in identical twins. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 May 25];21:275-8. Available from: http://www.meajo.org/text.asp?2014/21/3/275/134695


   Introduction Top


Myopia has a multifactorial origin with interaction between genetic and environmental factors. [1] Genetic factors play a major role in the development of myopia. For example, studies of twins indicate that genetic factors may account for up to 80% of the variance in myopia irrespective of the age of onset. [2] The prevalence of myopia has been steadily increasing over the last few decades [3],[4] with wide racial differences. [4],[5] A study from England, reported the prevalence of myopia in 10-11 year-old children as 25.2%, 10.0%, and 3.4% in South Asians, African-Caribbeans and white Europeans, respectively. [5] In developing countries in Asia, high myopia accounted for 10-20% of the over 80% of high school dropouts who were myopic. [6] Fitgerald et al. [7] evaluated 145 children with high myopia and found bilateral high myopia to be more common with a prevalence of 64%. Severe myopia is a significant public health problem because it may be associated with myopic macular degeneration, cataract, glaucoma, peripheral retinal changes (such as lattice degeneration), retinal tears and holes as well as retinal detachment. [8]

Anisometropia, by definition, exists when there is a difference in refractive status between an individual's eyes. [9] Myopic anisometropia is rare in twins. In this case report, I present the presence of severe anisometropic myopia in a pair of 11-year-old female identical twins.


   Case Report Top


A pair of 11-year-old identical twin sisters were seen in the eye clinic in April, 2012 with poor distant vision of one year duration. They had no associated complaints such as deviation of the eyes and there was no history of prior spectacle use. Their past medical histories were unremarkable. They were delivered at full term and there was no history suggestive of myopia in the family. The first twin had a distance visual acuity (VA) of counting fingers at two meters (0.03) in the right eye and near vision of N14 (0.4) and the left eye had a distance VA of 6/18 (0.3) and near vision of N4.5 (1.0). Cycloplegic (cyclopentolate 0.5%) refraction revealed an error of -6.50DS -2.00DC × 180 in the right eye and -1.00DS in the left eye. Best corrected VA was 6/12 (0.5) and N5 (0.9) with -6.00DS -2.00DC × 180 for the right eye and 6/6 (1.0) and N4.5 (1.0) with -1.00DS for the left eye. The difference in the spherical equivalent between the two eyes was - 6.5 diopters (D). On ocular examination there was no abnormality in the anterior segment of either eye. Funduscopic examination revealed a pink disc with peripapillary chorioretinal atrophy in the right eye and a normal fundus in the left eye. The patient was prescribed spectacles with full correction for the left eye and slight under-correction in the right eye.

The second twin had a distance VA of counting fingers at one meter (0.02) in the right eye and a near VA of N36 (0.1) while the left eye had a distance VA of 6/18 (0.3) and near vision of N4.5 (1.0). Cycloplegic refraction revealed an error of - 13.75DS - 2.25DC × 180 in the right eye and - 0.50DS -0.75DC × 04 in the left eye. There was no improvement in the VA with refraction in the right eye while the best corrected VA was 6/6 (1.0) and N4.5 (1.0) with - 0.50DS -0.50DC × 030 in the left eye. The difference in the spherical equivalent between the two eyes was -14D. On ocular examination, the anterior segments in both eyes were normal. Funduscopy revealed a hypoplastic disc with peripapillary chorioretinal atrophy in the right eye while the left fundus was normal. The patient was prescribed spectacles with full correction for the left eye and balanced for the right eye. There was no strabismus, and systemic examination did not reveal features of any genetic defect suggestive of syndromic high myopia. Genetic studies could not be performed due to the lack of the necessary facilities.

The refraction, radius of anterior corneal curvature and corneal refractive power were measured using the autorefractokeratometer (Accuref-K 9001; Ajinomoto Trading, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Axial length was measured with an A-scan ultrasonographer (Storz Alpha II; Bausch and Lomb Storz ® Instruments, Rochester, NY, USA). The results of these measurements are presented in [Table 1].
Table 1: Biometry and refraction results

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The occurrence of anisometropic myopia in identical twins with degenerative myopia in the same eye and simple myopia in the other suggests an underlying genetic defect in this condition. Genetic factors have been shown to have a major role to play in the development of myopia. Twin studies in European-derived populations have reported high heritability for myopia, in the 90% range, with similar figures for the various biometric factors that control refractive error, such as axial length, anterior chamber depth and corneal curvature. [10] Recently, a genome-wide association study identified a susceptibility locus for myopia on chromosome 15q14. [11] The genetic basis for the dissimilar growth between eyes in cases of unilateral high myopia has been attributed to the skewed lyonization in females heterozygous for X-linked myopia. [12] Skewed X-chromosome inactivation in the eye has been found in monozygotic twins and eye pairs of individuals discordant for color vision deficiency. [13] The difference in the right eyes of the sisters in this report may be due to variable expression of the underlying genetic defect.

Myopia can occur as an isolated finding or as a part of specific genetic syndromes. [14] These syndromes include the syndromic high myopias, in which high myopia is associated with other symptoms that define the disease, such as connective tissue disorders (e.g., Marfan and Stickler syndromes), and complete and incomplete congenital stationary night blindness. [3] Unlike these syndromes, however, the vast majority of individuals with moderate or severe myopia, have no associated defects. [14] The absence of associated defects in these sisters suggests a non-syndromic high myopia.

Myopic anisometropia is a rare type of anisometropia. [9] If it occurs with intact near vision it seldom results in amblyopia. When ordinary vision is however defocused due to high myopia, refractive amblyopia may occur. [9] Mild myopic anisometropia (less than -3D) usually does not cause amblyopia but unilateral high myopia (-6D or more) often results in severe amblyopic visual loss. [15] Unilateral high myopia with a difference of over -6D between the two eyes of the sisters in this report would account for the occurrence of amblyopia in the right eyes.

Severe myopia may be associated with posterior segment pathology. There was chorioretinal atrophy in the right eyes of both sisters with optic disc hypoplasia in the twin with the greater axial length. This could also have been a contributory factor in the development of amblyopia. Weiss [12] evaluated 48 children with anisometropic myopia and reported a high prevalence of unilateral optic nerve hypoplasia with associated visual deficits.

Amblyopia due to anisometropia is difficult to detect and is essentially asymptomatic unless accompanied by a squint. [16],[17] Diagnosis is therefore usually late [16] as in the current case report. The standard treatment for anisometropic amblyopia is correction of any refractive error with occlusion therapy. [16] Refractive correction is performed first using spectacles and/or contact lenses with subsequent patching and near activities once visual acuity plateaus. [18] High anisometropic amblyopia is however challenging to manage [16],[18] and has been reported to be the least responsive subtype of anisometropic amblyopia to treatment. [19] As a result, many clinicians would undercorrect the more myopic eye of these patients in order to allow the lenses to be more balanced optically and cosmetically, and do not pursue further treatment. [18]

Contact lenses with occlusion therapy can be used safely in children with amblyopia due to high anisometropia. [16] This would have been the preferred treatment option in this case but compliance and regular follow-up were identified as likely problems. Contact lenses may also be problematic. [20] Contacts can be difficult to insert and remove, are frequently lost, can be irritating to the eye or may be too costly. [21] Both sisters were boarding students and adequate supervision to ensure compliance could not be guaranteed in the absence of their parents. Compliance with amblyopia treatment has been found to be the most critical factor for predicting a successful outcome. [22]

Conventional treatment with glasses and occlusion therapy is usually unsuccessful but may be worth instituting as initial management. [16] Refractive correction alone using spectacles was performed for both sisters with undercorrection of the more myopic eye. Full refractive correction was not possible as the difference in the spherical equivalents would result in aniseikonia.

Refractive surgery, although controversial, is another option in the management of pediatric refractive errors. [23] The main indications are bilateral high ametropia and anisometropia where conventional treatment with spectacles or contact lens is not tolerated. [24] The most commonly performed procedures currently are surface ablation procedures using excimer laser. [24] The major drawback of surface ablation procedures is refractive regression, which is more pronounced in higher degrees of ametropia. [21],[24] When corneal refractive surgery is not possible, such as in extremely high myopia, phakic intraocular lens may be an option. [23],[25] Long-term endothelial cell loss remains a source of concern with phakic intraocular lens. [24] The advantages of these lenses are reversibility, predictability, and lack of regression. [24] Refractive surgery however has a limited role to play in the management of refractive errors in our environment as the equipment required are very expensive and are not readily available.

Regular monitoring of refraction in these sisters is mandatory as the myopia may still progress with an increase in the axial length of the eyes. For children between the ages of 6 and 15 years with myopia, increased progression in younger children and in those with greater myopia at the baseline examination has been a consistent finding. [26]

In conclusion, high anisometropic myopia may result in severe amblyopia especially when there is an associated abnormality of the eye. This case report is highly suggestive of an underlying genetic defect in its development.

 
   References Top

1.Mehdizadeh M, Jalaeian H, Kashef MA. Effects of various risk factors on myopia progression. Iran J Med Sci 2006;31:204-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Dirani M, Chamberlain M, Garoufalis P, Chen C, Guymer RH, Baird PN. Refractive errors in twin studies. Twin Res Hum Genet 2006;9:566-72.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet 2012;379:1739-48.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Bar Dayan Y, Levin A, Morad Y, Grotto I, Ben-David R, Goldberg A, et al. The changing prevalence of myopia in young adults: A 13-year series of population-based prevalence surveys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:2760-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Rudnicka AR, Owen CG, Nightingale CM, Cook DG, Whincup PH. Ethnic differences in the prevalence of myopia and ocular biometry in 10- and 11-year-old children: The Child Heart and Health Study in England (CHASE). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:6270-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Lin LL, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ. Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese school children: 1983 to 2000. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2004;33:27-33.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.FitzGerald DE, Chung I, Krumholtz I. An analysis of high myopia in a pediatric population less than 10 years of age. Optometry 2005;76:102-14.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Saw SM, Katz J, Schein OD, Chew SJ, Chan TK. Epidemiology of myopia. Epidemiol Rev 1996;18:175-87.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Park SJ, Kim JY, Baek SH, Kim ES, Kim US. One sister and brother with mirror image myopic anisometropia. Korean J Ophthalmol 2010;24:62-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Lyhne N, Sjølie AK, Kyvik KO, Green A. The importance of genes and environment for ocular refraction and its determiners: A population based study among 20-45 year old twins. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:1470-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Verhoeven VJ, Hysi PG, Saw SM, Vitart V, Mirshahi A, Guggenheim JA, et al. Large scale international replication and meta-analysis study confirms association of the 15q14 locus with myopia. The CREAM consortium. Hum Genet 2012;131:1467-80.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Weiss AH. Unilateral high myopia: Optical components, associated factors, and visual outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:1025-31.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.Jørgensen AL, Philip J, Raskind WH, Matsushita M, Christensen B, Dreyer V, et al. Different patterns of X inactivation in MZ twins discordant for red-green color-vision deficiency. Am J Hum Genet 1992;51:291-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Young TL. Dissecting the genetics of human high myopia: A molecular biological approach. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2004;102:423-45.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.Sethi S, Sethi MJ, Hussain I, Kundi NK. Causes of amblyopia in children coming to ophthalmology out patient department, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar. J Pak Med Assoc 2008;58:125-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Roberts CJ, Adams GG. Contact lenses in the management of high anisometropic amblyopia. Eye (Lond) 2002;16:577-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Cobb CJ, Russel K, Cox A, MacEwen CJ. Factors influencing visual outcome in anisometropic amblyopes. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:1278 - 81.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Pang Y, Allison C, Frantz KA, Block S, Goodfellow GW. A prospective pilot study of treatment outcomes for amblyopia associated with myopic anisometropia. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:579-84.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Kutschke PJ, Scott WE, Keech RV. Anisometropic amblyopia. Ophthalmology 1991;98:258-63.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Paysse EA. Refractive surgery in children: Is it ready for prime time? Am Orthopt J 2007;57:79-88.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.Tychsen L. Refractive surgery for children: Laser, implants, current results and future directions. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 2008;3:635-43.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Lithander J, Sjöstrand J. Anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia in the age group 2 years and above: a prospective study of results of treatment. Br J Ophthalmol 1991;75:111-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Daoud YJ, Hutchinson A, Wallace DK, Song J, Kim T. Refractive surgery in children: Treatment options, outcomes, and controversies. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:573-82.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Moran S, O' Keefe M. Refractive surgery in children. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol 2012;235-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Chipont EM, García-Hermosa P, Alió JL. Reversal of myopic anisometropic amblyopia with phakic intraocular lens implantation. J Refract Surg 2001;17:460-2.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Jensen H. Myopia progression in young school children. A prospective study of myopia progression and the effect of a trial with bifocal lenses and beta blocker eye drops. Acta Ophthalmol 1991;69:1-79.  Back to cited text no. 26
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1502    
    Printed34    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded116    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal