About MEAJO | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions to authors | Online submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology
Users Online: 356   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 24-29

Risks of cefuroxime prophylaxis for postcataract endophthalmitis


1 Research Department, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital; College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saud Arabia
2 Research Department, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saud Arabia; Department of Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

Correspondence Address:
Donald U Stone
King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Arouba Road, P.O. Box 7191, Riyadh 11462, Kingdom of Saud Arabia

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_255_16

Rights and Permissions

Background: Endophthalmitis after cataract surgery is a rare but vision-threatening complication. Intracameral cefuroxime (ICC) has been reported to be effective at reducing the risk, but concerns regarding the risks associated with this intervention remain. Methods: Systematic review and synthesis of the literature on ICC, with a focus on the risks of therapy. Results: Level 2a evidence was found to support the use of cefuroxime in penicillin-allergic patients. Compounding or dilutional errors are associated with ocular toxicity, but the incidence and risk of this occurrence are unknown. Level 4 evidence supports interventions that reduce the risk of dilutional errors. The association of cefuroxime injection with toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) is not established; Level 5 evidence supports standard measures to reduce the incidence of TASS related to cefuroxime administration. Conclusion: Cefuroxime can be administered safely to penicillin-allergic patients, and steps should be taken to reduce the risk of compounding or dilutional errors to avoid negating the benefits of this intervention. Recommended practice patterns for endophthalmitis prophylaxis should consider the risks and benefits of ICC.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1926    
    Printed30    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded108    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal