About MEAJO | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions to authors | Online submission | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact | Login 
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology
Users Online: 351   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
  Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 60-64  

Evaluation of Contrast sensitivity after four different treatment modalities using optec-functional vision analyzer in primary open-angle glaucoma


1 Department of Ophthalmology, Bahman Hospital, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Optometry, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Date of Web Publication26-Aug-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Parvin Azizzadeh
Bahman Ophthalmology Research Center, Bahman Hospital, Tehran
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_259_17

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the changes in contrast sensitivity (CS) after using the four different types of antiglaucoma eye drops in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) by OPTEC-functional vision analyzer (FVA).
METHODS: In this prospective study, eighty patients (80 eyes) with POAG were randomly divided into four groups. The groups were randomly received timolol maleate 0.5%, travoprost 0.004%, dorzolamide 2%, and brimonidine tartrate 0.2%. The medications were used in the eye that was randomly selected. The CS was assessed before and 15 min after the intervention by the FVA. The paired t-test was used to compare the difference between before and after the intervention. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Fifteen minutes after the instillation of timolol maleate (Group A), the CS in three out of twenty patients at the spatial frequencies of 1.5, and 3 cycles per degree (cpd) was significantly decreased (P = 0.015). However, using travoprost (Group B) and dorzolamide (Group C), the CS in one out of twenty patients at low spatial frequencies (1.5 and 3 cpd) was decreased in the two groups, which was not statistically significant for these medications (P > 0.05). In Group D, after applying brimonidine tartrate, the CS in two out of twenty patients at the spatial frequency of 18 cpd was significantly decreased (P = 0.042).
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that CS values at low and high spatial frequencies after applying timolol and brimonidine eye drops are temporarily reduced in patients with POAG.

Keywords: Contrast sensitivity, drugs, glaucoma


How to cite this article:
Azizzadeh P, Safarzadeh M. Evaluation of Contrast sensitivity after four different treatment modalities using optec-functional vision analyzer in primary open-angle glaucoma. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2019;26:60-4

How to cite this URL:
Azizzadeh P, Safarzadeh M. Evaluation of Contrast sensitivity after four different treatment modalities using optec-functional vision analyzer in primary open-angle glaucoma. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 10];26:60-4. Available from: http://www.meajo.org/text.asp?2019/26/2/60/265370




   Introduction Top


Glaucoma is a worldwide epidemiological challenge affecting approximately 4% of the global population.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7] Research shows that by 2010, an estimated 60.5 million people globally will be living with either angle-closure glaucoma or primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).[8]

Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most important modifiable risk factor for glaucoma and hence lowering of IOP is the goal of glaucoma therapy.[9],[10] Pharmacotherapy remains the chief management modality for the patients of glaucoma and ocular hypertension.[9]

Topical antiglaucoma medications act either by decreasing aqueous production beta-adrenergic antagonists, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors [CA-I]), increasing aqueous outflow (prostaglandin derivatives, cholinergic agonists) or both (alpha-2 adrenergic agonists).[9] Treatment is started with monotherapy, but in cases where monotherapy fails to attain the target IOP, other drugs are added.[9],[10] Factors that influence the choice of an agent are efficacy, safety profile, ease of administration, and cost.[11],[12] Dorzolamide is a powerful inhibitor of CA-II that penetrates the sclera and cornea to reach the ciliary process.[12],[13] CA-II inhibition slows the production of local bicarbonate, reduces the transport of sodium and fluid, and consequently reduces the aqueous humor production and IOP.[14]

Timolol is a nonselective beta-blocker that is eliminated by both hepatic metabolism and renal excretion, and it has little or no local anesthetic, membrane stabilizing, or sympathomimetic properties.[13],[15] Timolol reduces IOP by inhibiting aqueous humor production.[15],[16],[17] It has been found that timolol downregulates adenylate cyclase by inhibiting β2-adrenoceptor sites in the ciliary process.[18] Topical beta-blockers and CA inhibitors, such as dorzolamide and latanoprost usually in combination with beta-blockers and brimonidine, may have various side effects on visual acuity. Since their action mechanism is different, they have an additive effect when administered together.[19]

Alpha-adrenergic agonists such as brimonidine decrease the production of aqueous humor, increase aqueous humor outflow, and lower the IOP somewhat. It has a purite preservative (purite is a stabilized oxychloro complex acting as an oxidative preservative that is converted into natural tear components when exposed to light) that breaks down into natural tear components and may be better tolerated in people who have allergic reactions to preservatives in other eye drops.[12],[13],[19]

Contrast sensitivity (CS) is a parameter used to assess visual performance at different levels of contrast, which usually alters before any severe change in visual acuity.[20] There are various studies correlating the ability of individuals to fulfill complex tasks, such as driving performance, computer task accuracy, or even accomplish everyday activities with their CS function.[21],[22] Decreasing the quality of life has also been shown in relation to the deterioration of visual performance, including CS.[23] This prospective study was conducted to investigate changes in the CS related to reduction of IOP after starting the treatment of glaucoma with four different formulations of antiglaucoma eye drops.


   Methods Top


In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, a total of eighty volunteers (80 eyes) with POAG were randomly assigned for the four different types of antiglaucoma eye drops. All volunteers were recruited from glaucoma patients who were admitted to the private hospital (Bahman Hospital, Tehran, Iran) for ocular examination. The recruitment period started between March 2017 and August 2017. This study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. All patients included in the study were informed about the purpose of the study, and informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

In the study, the patients with POAG had IOP >21 mmHg, typical glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) with or without visual field defects, gonioscopy (Goldmann three-mirror lens) disclosing a 360° normal-appearing open-angle, and no apparent ocular or systemic abnormalities that might account for the increased IOP. The exclusion criteria included best-corrected visual acuity of <20/20, any sign of secondary glaucoma, significant media opacities, and a history of using oral or topical steroids.

Visual field standard automated perimetry findings (Humphrey Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Standard 24-2, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) were considered suggestive of glaucoma when either defect of three or more points in cluster with a probability of <5% in a nonedge localization at the pattern deviation plot were observed, or a pattern standard deviation index with a probability of <5% was found or a normal outside limit result was obtained in the glaucoma Hemifield test.

A closed-system CS testing device, the OPTEC-functional vision analyzer (FVA; Stereo Optical Co., Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to examine CS values under daytime without glare. The FVA has rotating slide packages for other visual functions, including visual acuity, disability glare, and stereo and color vision. The CS testing device contains the Functional Acuity Contrast Test chart, which uses three orientations for the gratings: Oriented vertically or tilted 15° to the right or left. Participants identified the orientation of each grating and were required to guess when they could not determine the orientation of gratings. The CS testing device controls light levels with sensors to achieve consistent conditions for each test. This device supplies at a target luminance level of 85 candela per square meter (cd/m 2) for the condition of daytime in compliance with the American National Standards Institute. It evaluates spatial frequencies using sine-wave grating charts of 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd).

The volunteers with glaucoma were randomly divided into four groups. Each group comprised 20 patients. The mean age in the Groups of A, B, C, and D was 45.34 ± 9.26 years, 44.61 ± 10.05 years, 44.51 ± 9.47 years, and 44.96 ± 9.86 years, respectively. The CS was recorded at baseline examination before the intervention. Then, for each group, a different type of antiglaucoma drops was randomly assigned. Antiglaucoma eye drops were instilled in the eye that was randomly selected. In the group of A from timolol maleate 0.5%, in the group of B from travoprost 0.004%, in the group of C from dorzolamide 2%, and in the group of D from brimonidine tartrate 0.2% eye drops was randomly used. Then, 15 min after the instillation of the medications, the CS test was repeated. The CS measurements were performed by a single operator that was blind to the allocation of treatment for patients in the groups. Allocation was based on computer-generated random numbers and was concealed by using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. All the patients had done the CS test for the first time during our study, and each test lasted approximately 10 min. All the CS values were converted to logarithmic values.

The data were analyzed using paired-samples t- test to assess the CS changes between prior to and 15 min after the intervention. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (Windows version 19.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.


   Results Top


The age range of patients in the Groups of A, B, C and D was 40–58 years, 39–60 years, 40–63 years, and 40–59 years, respectively. As presented in [Table 1], there was no significant difference in sex (P = 0.133) or age (P = 0.296) among the four groups.
Table 1: Clinical features in the four groups of primary open-angle glaucoma patients after intervention

Click here to view


In Group A, the CS was decreased by 0.2 log units in 3 out of 20 patients 15 min after applying timolol maleate 0.5% at the spatial frequencies of 1.5 and 3 cpd, in which this change was statistically significant (P = 0.015) [Table 1] and [Table 2].
Table 2: Results of contrast sensitivity after using antiglaucoma eye drops in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma

Click here to view


In Groups B and C, only one patient showed a decrease in the CS by 0.2 log units 15 min after the intervention at the spatial frequencies of 1.5 and 3 cpd, which was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

In Group D, 15 min after the instillation of brimonidine tartrate 0.2%, the CS in 2 out of 20 patients with POAG at the spatial frequency of 18 cpd decreased by 0.2 log units, which was statistically significant (P = 0.042).


   Discussion Top


In this study, the changes of CS between before and after the use of the four different antiglaucoma eye drops in patients with POAG were studied. Various studies have been conducted on the effect of the antiglaucoma medications on CS after a period of 4 weeks or many months, but in this study, the evaluation of CS using OPTEC-FVA was performed 15 min after the instillation of the four different types of antiglaucoma eye drops. The CS function has been used to evaluate the quality of vision in several conditions, including various forms of retinopathy, cataract surgery/IOL implantation, and glaucoma.[24],[25],[26]

Most studies have focused on the long term effects of the antiglaucoma eye drops on visual function.[27],[28],[29] Their results are controversial, although there are great numbers of reports outlining an improvement in CS four or more weeks after the drug administration, especially at intermediate spatial frequencies (6 and 12 cpd).[28] This improvement can be attributed to a recovery of the damaged ganglion cells and their microenvironment due to the lowering of the IOP and an increase in the ocular perfusion and hemodynamics.[30]

In the study performed by Hiraoka et al.[31] found that there is a substantial reduction in the CS function for at least 5 min after the instillation of timolol gel-forming solution and brinzolamide, and this temporary decrease was fully restored 15 min after the instillation of drugs. But in our study, the reduction of CS was detected 15 min after the intervention.

In the study performed by Chatzibalis et al.[32] found that the value of CS is reduced 20 min after the instillation of diclofenac sodium, dorzolamide/timolol, and brimonidine. West et al.[33] showed that the CS level of = 1.40 log units and = 1.30 log units after the use of diclofenac sodium is associated with disability in reading and recognition of faces in people older than 65 years. In the present study, the value of CS at low spatial frequencies (1.5 and 3 cpd) after applying timolol maleate 0.5%, travoprost 0.004%, and dorzolamide 2% decreased that this the reduction of CS, 15 min after the instillation of the antiglaucoma eye drops was 0.20 log units. Furthermore, the reduction of CS at the levels of 1.5 and 3 cpd after applying timolol was statistically significant.

In contrast, Evans et al.[30] was evaluated the CS of 16 patients with POAG using brimonidine and timolol. In their study reported an improvement at the spatial frequencies of 6 and 12 cpd with using brimonidine but found no significant changes in the group tested with timolol. In our study, 15 min after the instillation of brimonidine, the CS at high spatial frequency (18 cpd) decreased by 0.20 log units, which was statistically significant. The differences in baseline measurements, and the follow-up time between the previous study and the present study, may be responsible for the various outcomes in the two studies. In our study, 15 min after using travoprost and dorzolamide, there was no significant difference in the CS changes compared to patients who used the two other antiglaucoma drops.


   Conclusion Top


Our study showed that the CS of POAG patients at high- and low-spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, and 18 cpd) may be temporarily changed 15 min after the use of timolol and brimonidine. Therefore, before starting treatment with these the two types of antiglaucoma medications, it should be sufficiently explained to patients. Since, according to our experience, it is mandatory to customize medical therapy for any patient with glaucoma.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Vijaya L, George R, Paul PG, Baskaran M, Arvind H, Raju P, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in a rural South Indian population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4461-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, Yamamoto T, Abe H, Shirato S, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: The Tajimi study. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1641-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Leske MC. Open-angle glaucoma – An epidemiologic overview. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2007;14:166-72.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Sakata K, Sakata LM, Sakata VM, Santini C, Hopker LM, Bernardes R, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in a South Brazilian population: Projeto glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:4974-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Congdon N, O'Colmain B, Klaver CC, Klein R, Muñoz B, Friedman DS, et al. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:477-85.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Aström S, Stenlund H, Lindén C. Incidence and prevalence of pseudoexfoliations and open-angle glaucoma in Northern Sweden: II. Results after 21 years of follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:832-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Antón A, Andrada MT, Mujica V, Calle MA, Portela J, Mayo A. Prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a Spanish population: The Segovia study. J Glaucoma 2004;13:371-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:262-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Schwartz K, Budenz D. Current management of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:119-26.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Glaucoma: Diagnosis and Management of ChronicOpen-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension; April, 2009. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21938863. [Last accessed on 2010 Feb 16].  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Marquis RE, Whitson JT. Management of glaucoma: Focus on pharmacological therapy. Drugs Aging 2005;22:1-21.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Hoyng PF, van Beek LM. Pharmacological therapy for glaucoma: A review. Drugs 2000;59:411-34.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Heel RC, Brogden RN, Speight TM, Avery GS. Timolol: A review of its therapeutic efficacy in the topical treatment of glaucoma. Drugs 1979;17:38-55.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Sugrue MF. Pharmacological and ocular hypotensive properties of topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Prog Retin Eye Res 2000;19:87-112.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Coakes RL, Brubaker RF. The mechanism of timolol in lowering intraocular pressure. In the normal eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1978;96:2045-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Sonntag JR, Brindley GO, Shields MB. Effect of timolol therapy on outflow facility. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978;17:293-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Zimmerman TJ, Harbin R, Pett M, Kaufman HE. Timolol and facility of outflow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977;16:623-4.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Phylactos AC. Timolol inhibits adenylate cyclase activity in the iris-ciliary body and trabecular meshwork of the eye and blocks activation of the enzyme by salbutamol. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1986;64:613-22.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ormrod D, McClellan K. Topical dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5%: A review of its use in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. Drugs Aging 2000;17:477-96.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Hawkins AS, Szlyk JP, Ardickas Z, Alexander KR, Wilensky JT. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2003;12:134-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Owsley C, Ball K, McGwin G Jr., Sloane ME, Roenker DL, White MF, et al. Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. JAMA 1998;279:1083-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Jacko JA. Impact of visual function on computer task accuracy and reaction time in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:350-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Brown GC. Vision and quality-of-life. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1999;97:473-511.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Trick GL, Burde RM, Gordon MO, Santiago JV, Kilo C. The relationship between hue discrimination and contrast sensitivity deficits in patients with diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmology 1988;95:693-8.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Jay JL, Chakrabarti HS, Morrison JD. Quality of vision through diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 1991;75:359-66.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Stamper RL. Psychophysical changes in glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 1989;33 Suppl:309-18.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Klein BE, Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE, Danforth LG, Reinke JO, et al. Associations of selected medications and visual function: The beaver dam eye study. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:403-8.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Prata TS, Piassi MV, Melo LA Jr. Changes in visual function after intraocular pressure reduction using antiglaucoma medications. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:1081-5.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Arend O, Harris A, Wolter P, Remky A. Evaluation of retinal haemodynamics and retinal function after application of dorzolamide, timolol and latanoprost in newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma patients. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003;81:474-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Evans DW, Hosking SL, Gherghel D, Bartlett JD. Contrast sensitivity improves after brimonidine therapy in primary open angle glaucoma: A case for neuroprotection. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:1463-5.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Hiraoka T, Daito M, Okamoto F, Kiuchi T, Oshika T. Contrast sensitivity and optical quality of the eye after instillation of timolol maleate gel-forming solution and brinzolamide ophthalmic suspension. Ophthalmology 2010;117:2080-7.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Chatzibalis T, Stamoulas K, Karamitsos A, Almaliotis D, Mirtsou-Fidani V, Georgiadis N, et al. Contrast sensitivity and eye drops. Open J Ophthalmol 2012;2:60-3.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
West SK, Rubin GS, Broman AT, Muñoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, Turano K. How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE project. Salisbury eye evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:774-80.  Back to cited text no. 33
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed461    
    Printed34    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded38    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal